Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Syndicat des travailleuses et travailleurs c. Centre L’Autre Maison inc.
Tribunal d'arbitrage (Québec) · Nov 21, 2025
CanadaEditorial impact: lowfake citationscontracttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Reference submitted at final pleadings for 'Commission scolaire régionale Chauveau c. Roberge, [1980] C.A. 37' could not be located; court searched SOQUIJ and employer failed to produce text, concluding the decision likely does not exist. Outcome: Warning. "[134] Même si l’arbitre de griefs est un tribunal administratif moins formel que le sont laCour supérieure ou les autres tribunaux judiciaires, notamment parce que ses règles depreuve sont plus souples, il n’en demeure pas moins que c’est un tribunal.…
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | Reference submitted at final pleadings for 'Commission scolaire régionale Chauveau c. Roberge, [1980] C.A. 37' could not be located; court searched SOQUIJ and employer failed to produce text, concluding the decision likely does not exist. || Fabricated: Case Law | Reference submitted as 'Morin c. Commission scolaire de Laval (C.A., 1997)' could not be located; court unable to verify and employer did not produce the decision. || Fabricated: Case Law | Reference submitted as 'Desrosiers c. Hôpital Sainte-Anne (T.A., 2001)' was not found in searches and was not produced by employer; court concluded it likely does not exist. || Fabricated: Case Law | Reference submitted as 'Caron c. Ville de Montréal (C.R.T., 2010)' could not be located; court found employer did not provide the text and the citation appears nonexistent.
- Why it matters now
- Arbitration panels now publish warnings for hallucinated citations — informality of the forum is no defense.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Reference submitted at final pleadings for 'Commission scolaire régionale Chauveau c. Roberge, [1980] C.A. 37' could not be located; court searched SOQUIJ and employer failed to produce text, concluding the decision likely does not exist. Outcome: Warning. "[134] Même si l’arbitre de griefs est un tribunal administratif moins formel que le sont laCour supérieure ou les autres tribunaux judiciaires, notamment parce que ses règles depreuve sont plus souples, il n’en demeure pas moins que c’est un tribunal. À l’évidence,le procureur qui, devant ce tribunal, s’appuie sur de la jurisprudence doit s’assurer qu’elleexiste.[135] L’arbitre de griefs s’attend à ce que tous les procureurs qui plaident devant luisoient compétents, honnêtes, professionnels et respectueux de son autorité.Manifestement, celui qui soumet au tribunal des références jurisprudentielles inexistantesne satisfait pas ces attentes, car il induit, intentionnellement ou non, le tribunal et la partieadverse en erreur.[136] Qui plus est, le procureur qui fait référence à de la jurisprudence qui n’existe pasrallonge inutilement l’arbitrage. On reproche déjà, souvent avec raison, la longueur etles coûts élevés associés à l’arbitrage de griefs. Ces problèmes seront exacerbés si lesinformations inexactes générées par les hallucinations d’outils d’intelligence artificielles’introduisent devant les tribunaux d’arbitrage en raison de la négligence des procureurs.Le présent cas en est un bon exemple.[137] Enfin, le procureur qui fait référence à de la jurisprudence inexistante expose lapartie qu’il représente à devoir compenser les dommages que cela pourrait causer àl’autre partie.[138] En définitive, référer à des décisions qui n’existent pas, comme l’a fait laprocureure patronale dans le présent dossier, est un geste répréhensible qui ne devraitjamais se produire en arbitrage de griefs. Ce comportement est d’autant plus grave quecette procureure est membre de l’Ordre des conseillers en ressources humaines agréés."
Operational lesson
Arbitration panels now publish warnings for hallucinated citations — informality of the forum is no defense.
Record details
CourtTribunal d'arbitrage (Québec)
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateNov 21, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Warning
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Reference submitted at final pleadings for 'Commission scolaire régionale Chauveau c. Roberge, [1980] C.A. 37' could not be located; court searched SOQUIJ and employer failed to produce text, concluding the decision likely does not exist.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Reference submitted as 'Morin c. Commission scolaire de Laval (C.A., 1997)' could not be located; court unable to verify and employer did not produce the decision.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Reference submitted as 'Desrosiers c. Hôpital Sainte-Anne (T.A., 2001)' was not found in searches and was not produced by employer; court concluded it likely does not exist.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Reference submitted as 'Caron c. Ville de Montréal (C.R.T., 2010)' could not be located; court found employer did not provide the text and the citation appears nonexistent.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Syndicat des travailleuses et travailleurs c. Centre L’Autre Maison inc.?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Reference submitted at final pleadings for 'Commission scolaire régionale Chauveau c. Roberge, [1980] C.A. 37' could not be located; court searched SOQUIJ and employer failed to produce text, concluding the decision likely does not exist. Outcome: Warning. "[134] Même si l’arbitre de griefs est un tribunal administratif moins formel que le sont laCour supérieure ou les autres tribunaux judiciaires, notamment parce que ses règles depreuve sont plus souples, il n’en demeure pas moins que c’est un tribunal.…
- Why does Syndicat des travailleuses et travailleurs c. Centre L’Autre Maison inc. matter for legal AI risk?
- Arbitration panels now publish warnings for hallucinated citations — informality of the forum is no defense.
- What does the public record establish about Syndicat des travailleuses et travailleurs c. Centre L’Autre Maison inc.?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this Syndicat des travailleuses et travailleurs c. Centre L’Autre Maison inc. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.