Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Syreeta LaShawn McNeal v. Vera L. Calvin, et al.
E.D. Missouri · May 19, 2026
MS / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authorityother
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff repeatedly cited a non-existent opinion titled "Weniger v. Dynamic Recovery Solutions, LLC" with a referenced case number and Westlaw citation; the Court found no such case and noted the citation pointed to unrelated authorities. Outcome: Order to provide certification with every future filing. Order to Show Cause is here.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Order to provide certification with every future filing; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to provide certification with every future filing in E.D. Missouri, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff repeatedly cited a non-existent opinion titled "Weniger v. Dynamic Recovery Solutions, LLC" with a referenced case number and Westlaw citation; the Court found no such case and noted the citation pointed to unrelated authorities. Outcome: Order to provide certification with every future filing. Order to Show Cause is here.
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to provide certification with every future filing in E.D. Missouri, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
MississippiSingle-state evidence scope
CourtE.D. Missouri
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit5th Circuit
DateMay 19, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeOrder to provide certification with every future filing
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Order to provide certification with every future filing
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff repeatedly cited a non-existent opinion titled "Weniger v. Dynamic Recovery Solutions, LLC" with a referenced case number and Westlaw citation; the Court found no such case and noted the citation pointed to unrelated authorities.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Steen v. Murray, 919 F. Supp. 2d 993, 997 (S.D. Iowa 2013) as supporting a venue argument, but the Court found the citation mischaracterized the case's holding.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Syreeta LaShawn McNeal v. Vera L. Calvin, et al.?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff repeatedly cited a non-existent opinion titled "Weniger v. Dynamic Recovery Solutions, LLC" with a referenced case number and Westlaw citation; the Court found no such case and noted the citation pointed to unrelated authorities. Outcome: Order to provide certification with every future filing. Order to Show Cause is here.
- Why does Syreeta LaShawn McNeal v. Vera L. Calvin, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Order to provide certification with every future filing in E.D. Missouri, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Syreeta LaShawn McNeal v. Vera L. Calvin, et al.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Syreeta LaShawn McNeal v. Vera L. Calvin, et al. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.