HomeCasesThu Thuy Nguyen v. PennyMac Loan Services

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Thu Thuy Nguyen v. PennyMac Loan Services

D. Nevada · Jan 7, 2026

NV / federalEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationscontracttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Obot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; the Court could not locate the D. Nev. decision and concluded it was fake. Outcome: Warning; Possible Monetary Sanction.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Obot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; the Court could not locate the D. Nev. decision and concluded it was fake. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited McCart-Pollak v. On Demand Capital Grp., LLC; the Court was unable to locate this D. Nev. decision and found it to be fake. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited U.S. Bank N.A. v. Farhi; the Court could not locate the authority as cited and determined it to be fake. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Bernard v. First Horizon Home Loan Corp.; the Court was unable to locate the D. Nev. decision and found the citation to be fake.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning; Possible Monetary Sanction.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Obot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; the Court could not locate the D. Nev. decision and concluded it was fake. Outcome: Warning; Possible Monetary Sanction.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning; Possible Monetary Sanction.

Record details

NevadaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Nevada

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateJan 7, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning; Possible Monetary Sanction

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning; Possible Monetary Sanction

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Obot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; the Court could not locate the D. Nev. decision and concluded it was fake.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited McCart-Pollak v. On Demand Capital Grp., LLC; the Court was unable to locate this D. Nev. decision and found it to be fake.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited U.S. Bank N.A. v. Farhi; the Court could not locate the authority as cited and determined it to be fake.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Bernard v. First Horizon Home Loan Corp.; the Court was unable to locate the D. Nev. decision and found the citation to be fake.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Thu Thuy Nguyen v. PennyMac Loan Services?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Obot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; the Court could not locate the D. Nev. decision and concluded it was fake. Outcome: Warning; Possible Monetary Sanction.
Why does Thu Thuy Nguyen v. PennyMac Loan Services matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning; Possible Monetary Sanction.
What does the public record establish about Thu Thuy Nguyen v. PennyMac Loan Services?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Thu Thuy Nguyen v. PennyMac Loan Services summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Wendy Wolkenstein and Rebecca Knepp v. Dan Heinrich and Samual TilleryD. Nevada · Apr 6, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Anthony Wallace v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC, et al.D. Nevada · Mar 26, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Nicole Beverly Silverberg v. Steven Bonomo, et al.D. Nevada · Dec 30, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Coleman & Lewis v. PNC Bank, N.A.D. Nevada · Nov 5, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Melinda L'Shay Johnson v. MINI of Las VegasD. Nevada · Sep 24, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Preston House v. TH Foods, Inc.D. Nevada · Jun 18, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Obot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; the Court could not locate the D. Nev. decision and concluded it was fake. Outcome: Warning; Possible Monetary Sanction.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning; Possible Monetary Sanction.

Record details

NevadaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Nevada

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateJan 7, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning; Possible Monetary Sanction

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Obot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; the Court could not locate the D. Nev. decision and concluded it was fake.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited McCart-Pollak v. On Demand Capital Grp., LLC; the Court was unable to locate this D. Nev. decision and found it to be fake.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited U.S. Bank N.A. v. Farhi; the Court could not locate the authority as cited and determined it to be fake.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Bernard v. First Horizon Home Loan Corp.; the Court was unable to locate the D. Nev. decision and found the citation to be fake.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Thu Thuy Nguyen v. PennyMac Loan Services?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Obot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; the Court could not locate the D. Nev. decision and concluded it was fake. Outcome: Warning; Possible Monetary Sanction.

Why does Thu Thuy Nguyen v. PennyMac Loan Services matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in D. Nevada, with the listed outcome: Warning; Possible Monetary Sanction.

What does the public record establish about Thu Thuy Nguyen v. PennyMac Loan Services?

Which source supports this Thu Thuy Nguyen v. PennyMac Loan Services summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.