HomeCasesTina Rose v. City of West Frankfort et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Tina Rose v. City of West Frankfort et al.

S.D. Illinois · Mar 10, 2026

IL / federalEditorial impact: lowpro secivil rightstrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

The court dismissed several claims without prejudice and warned the self-represented plaintiff that, if automated drafting tools were used, she remained responsible for ensuring that her filings did not contain fabricated case law, citations, or quotations.

Why the court cared: The linked record identifies pro se and civil rights and records Warning. This page does not infer judicial reasoning beyond the source.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and civil rights involving ChatGPT with Warning in S.D. Illinois, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and civil rights involving ChatGPT with Warning in S.D. Illinois, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

IllinoisSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtS.D. Illinois

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit7th Circuit

DateMar 10, 2026

AI toolChatGPT

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Tina Rose v. City of West Frankfort et al.?: The court dismissed several claims without prejudice and warned the self-represented plaintiff that, if automated drafting tools were used, she remained responsible for ensuring that her filings did not contain fabricated case law, citations, or quotations.
Why does Tina Rose v. City of West Frankfort et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and civil rights involving ChatGPT with Warning in S.D. Illinois, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Tina Rose v. City of West Frankfort et al.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Tina Rose v. City of West Frankfort et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

John P. Chapman v. Officer Decker et al.S.D. Illinois · Jul 10, 2026same court · civil rights + trial Boyd v. Protestant Memorial Medical CenterS.D. Illinois · Nov 26, 2025same court · pro se + trial Ifeoma Delliane Chinedu Obi v. Cook County, Illinois, et al. (2)N.D. Illinois · Jun 10, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + civil rights Faisal Rahman v. Michael J. Burton, et al.N.D. Illinois · Apr 30, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + civil rights Ifeoma Delliane Chinedu Obi v. Cook County, Illinois, et al. (1)N.D. Illinois · Apr 9, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + civil rights Bettis v. GastonN.D. Illinois · Feb 9, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + civil rights

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and civil rights involving ChatGPT with Warning in S.D. Illinois, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Tina Rose v. City of West Frankfort et al.?

Why does Tina Rose v. City of West Frankfort et al. matter for legal AI risk?

This matter connects pro se and civil rights involving ChatGPT with Warning in S.D. Illinois, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

What does the public record establish about Tina Rose v. City of West Frankfort et al.?

Which source supports this Tina Rose v. City of West Frankfort et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.