Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
John P. Chapman v. Officer Decker et al.
S.D. Illinois · Jul 10, 2026
IL / federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationsmisrepresented authoritycivil rightstrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendants cited Gutierrez v. Kermon, 722 F.3d 1003, 1011 (7th Cir. 2013) for the proposition that de minimis injuries do not rise to a constitutional violation; the Court found Gutierrez did not address that proposition as cited. Outcome: Warning.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in S.D. Illinois, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendants cited Gutierrez v. Kermon, 722 F.3d 1003, 1011 (7th Cir. 2013) for the proposition that de minimis injuries do not rise to a constitutional violation; the Court found Gutierrez did not address that proposition as cited. Outcome: Warning.
Operational lesson
This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in S.D. Illinois, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
IllinoisSingle-state evidence scope
CourtS.D. Illinois
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit7th Circuit
DateJul 10, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Warning
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendants cited Gutierrez v. Kermon, 722 F.3d 1003, 1011 (7th Cir. 2013) for the proposition that de minimis injuries do not rise to a constitutional violation; the Court found Gutierrez did not address that proposition as cited.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Defendants cited Estate of Allen v. City of Chicago, No. 16-cv-8094, 2018 WL 4495982, at *4 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 19, 2018); the Court found this case does not exist (fabricated citation).
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendants cited Williams v. Rodriguez, 509 F.3d 392, 401 (7th Cir. 2007) for a causation proposition; the Court found that opinion did not address causation as defendants claimed.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendants cited Houskins v. Sheahan, 549 F.3d 480, 495 (7th Cir. 2008) for causation-related support; the Court found Houskins did not address that issue as cited.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in John P. Chapman v. Officer Decker et al.?
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendants cited Gutierrez v. Kermon, 722 F.3d 1003, 1011 (7th Cir. 2013) for the proposition that de minimis injuries do not rise to a constitutional violation; the Court found Gutierrez did not address that proposition as cited. Outcome: Warning.
- Why does John P. Chapman v. Officer Decker et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in S.D. Illinois, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about John P. Chapman v. Officer Decker et al.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this John P. Chapman v. Officer Decker et al. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.