AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 25, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesBoyd v. Protestant Memorial Medical Center
Evidence review: primary document verified. The linked primary document was extracted and checked with page-level evidence locators.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passes the current publication gate; that is not a legal-editorial review or a guarantee that every field has been independently verified.
Corpus matter record

Boyd v. Protestant Memorial Medical Center

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

S.D. Illinois · Nov 26, 2025

IL / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authorityemploymentWarning
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Fleming v. Chicago Transit Authority, 2006 WL 769440 (N.D. Ill. 2006); court determined the citation is inconsistent/non-existent (case filed in 2007) and cannot be located as cited. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Fleming v. Chicago Transit Authority, 2006 WL 769440 (N.D. Ill. 2006); court determined the citation is inconsistent/non-existent (case filed in 2007) and cannot be located as cited. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Bickler v. Senior Lifestyle Corp., 266 F.R.D. 379 as Seventh Circuit/N.D. Ill. authority; court noted the citation is incorrect (Bickler is 266 F.R.D. 379 (D. Ariz. 2010)) and does not support her claimed proposition.
Why it matters now
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in S.D. Illinois, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Fleming v. Chicago Transit Authority, 2006 WL 769440 (N.D. Ill. 2006); court determined the citation is inconsistent/non-existent (case filed in 2007) and cannot be located as cited. Outcome: Warning.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in S.D. Illinois, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Record details

IllinoisSingle-state evidence scope
Explore ILOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtS.D. Illinois
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit7th Circuit
DateNov 26, 2025
NO
AI toolNo tool named in source
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Fleming v. Chicago Transit Authority, 2006 WL 769440 (N.D. Ill. 2006); court determined the citation is inconsistent/non-existent (case filed in 2007) and cannot be located as cited.
  2. Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Bickler v. Senior Lifestyle Corp., 266 F.R.D. 379 as Seventh Circuit/N.D. Ill. authority; court noted the citation is incorrect (Bickler is 266 F.R.D. 379 (D. Ariz. 2010)) and does not support her claimed proposition.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Boyd v. Protestant Memorial Medical Center?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Fleming v. Chicago Transit Authority, 2006 WL 769440 (N.D. Ill. 2006); court determined the citation is inconsistent/non-existent (case filed in 2007) and cannot be located as cited. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Boyd v. Protestant Memorial Medical Center matter for legal AI risk?
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in S.D. Illinois, with the listed outcome: Warning.
What does the public record establish about Boyd v. Protestant Memorial Medical Center?
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Boyd v. Protestant Memorial Medical Center summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

John P. Chapman v. Officer Decker et al.S.D. Illinois · Jul 10, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authorityUnited States of America v. SmithN.D. Illinois · Aug 7, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citationsSean Gottlieb v. Adtalem Global EducationN.D. Illinois · Dec 10, 2025same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citationsCabrera Thompson v. Seattle Public SchoolsW.D. Washington · Sep 17, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: No tool named in sourceA2501117BC WCAT · Aug 13, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: No tool named in sourceNatashah Al-Ali v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.E.D. Michigan · Jul 31, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: No tool named in source

This record involves a self-represented party. See all pro se litigant AI hallucination decisions in the corpus, with counts by year, country and outcome.

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.