HomeCasesTwist It Up, Inc. v. Annie International, Inc.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Twist It Up, Inc. v. Annie International, Inc.

C.D. California · Jun 26, 2025

CA / federalEditorial impact: mediumfake citationsmisrepresented authoritycontracttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Citation to "Lewis v. CCPOA, 2009 WL 890585, at *4 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2009)" does not match the cited court/date/Westlaw identifier; court notes a different Lewis decision exists with a different Westlaw ID and date. Outcome: Monetary Sanction. Penalty decided in an order from the next day.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Monetary Sanction; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Monetary Sanction in C.D. California, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Monetary Sanction in C.D. California, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CaliforniaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtC.D. California

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateJun 26, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeMonetary Sanction

Known amount$500

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Monetary Sanction

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Citation to "Lewis v. CCPOA, 2009 WL 890585, at *4 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2009)" does not match the cited court/date/Westlaw identifier; court notes a different Lewis decision exists with a different Westlaw ID and date.
Fabricated: Case Law | Citation to "James v. Claussen, 2022 WL 1120273, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2022)" does not correspond to any such case; Westlaw identifier cited corresponds to an appellee brief in a Texas Court of Appeals.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation to Hernandez v. Polanco Enters., Inc., 19 F. Supp. 3d 918, 931 (N.D. Cal. 2013) is to a real decision but the order cited does not address depositions or corrections as the Opposition suggests.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Twist It Up, Inc. v. Annie International, Inc.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Citation to "Lewis v. CCPOA, 2009 WL 890585, at *4 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2009)" does not match the cited court/date/Westlaw identifier; court notes a different Lewis decision exists with a different Westlaw ID and date. Outcome: Monetary Sanction. Penalty decided in an order from the next day.
Why does Twist It Up, Inc. v. Annie International, Inc. matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Monetary Sanction in C.D. California, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Twist It Up, Inc. v. Annie International, Inc.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Twist It Up, Inc. v. Annie International, Inc. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Song Dow Lee, et al. v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association, et al.C.D. California · May 7, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Estate of Khallid Muhammad et al v. Tupac Shakur Estate et alC.D. California · Feb 26, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority N.Z. et al. v. Fenix International Ltd. et al. (OnlyFans)C.D. California · Sep 12, 2025same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Yi-Sheng Fang, et al. v. Hechalou US LLC, et al.C.D. California · Sep 12, 2025same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Flowz Digital v. Caroline DalalC.D. California · May 5, 2025same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Pedro Paulo Mansur Pagano Sampaio v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.C.D. California · Jul 2, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Record details

CaliforniaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtC.D. California

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateJun 26, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeMonetary Sanction

Known amount$500

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Citation to "James v. Claussen, 2022 WL 1120273, at *3 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2022)" does not correspond to any such case; Westlaw identifier cited corresponds to an appellee brief in a Texas Court of Appeals.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation to Hernandez v. Polanco Enters., Inc., 19 F. Supp. 3d 918, 931 (N.D. Cal. 2013) is to a real decision but the order cited does not address depositions or corrections as the Opposition suggests.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Twist It Up, Inc. v. Annie International, Inc.?

Why does Twist It Up, Inc. v. Annie International, Inc. matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Twist It Up, Inc. v. Annie International, Inc.?

Which source supports this Twist It Up, Inc. v. Annie International, Inc. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.