HomeCasesUniversity Mall v. Okorie et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

University Mall v. Okorie et al.

S.D. Mississippi · Oct 22, 2025

MS / federalEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationsfabricated quotescontract

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Case Law | Okorie attributed non-existent rulings/quotes to an existing case; Court noted misattributed/false quotation tied to Kaepa, Inc. v. Achilles Corp. Outcome: Civil contempt.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Civil contempt; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Civil contempt in S.D. Mississippi, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

False Quotes: Case Law | Okorie attributed non-existent rulings/quotes to an existing case; Court noted misattributed/false quotation tied to Kaepa, Inc. v. Achilles Corp. Outcome: Civil contempt.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Civil contempt in S.D. Mississippi, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

MississippiSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtS.D. Mississippi

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit5th Circuit

DateOct 22, 2025

AI toolUnidentified

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeCivil contempt

Known amount$1

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Civil contempt

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Okorie attributed non-existent rulings/quotes to an existing case; Court noted misattributed/false quotation tied to Kaepa, Inc. v. Achilles Corp.
Fabricated: Case Law | Court identified a non-existent case citation Okorie used in filings: 'United States v. Morgan, 2017 WL 1387302, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2017)' and characterized it as AI-generated and non-existent.

Questions this record answers

What happened in University Mall v. Okorie et al.?: False Quotes: Case Law | Okorie attributed non-existent rulings/quotes to an existing case; Court noted misattributed/false quotation tied to Kaepa, Inc. v. Achilles Corp. Outcome: Civil contempt.
Why does University Mall v. Okorie et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Civil contempt in S.D. Mississippi, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about University Mall v. Okorie et al.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this University Mall v. Okorie et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Pauliah v. University of Mississippi Medical CenterS.D. Mississippi · Dec 30, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Latasha Hill v. Auto Club Family Insurance CompanyS.D. Mississippi · Sep 17, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Malone-Bey v. Lauderdale County School BoardS.D. Mississippi · Jul 25, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Joshua Harris v. Pinnacle Bank (2)N.D. Mississippi · May 7, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations Yuri Petrini v. City of Biloxi, Mississippi, et al.S.D. Mississippi · Jun 30, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Johnny Fuselier v. John S. RiscassiS.D. Mississippi · May 1, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

False Quotes: Case Law | Okorie attributed non-existent rulings/quotes to an existing case; Court noted misattributed/false quotation tied to Kaepa, Inc. v. Achilles Corp. Outcome: Civil contempt.

Operational lesson

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Okorie attributed non-existent rulings/quotes to an existing case; Court noted misattributed/false quotation tied to Kaepa, Inc. v. Achilles Corp.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court identified a non-existent case citation Okorie used in filings: 'United States v. Morgan, 2017 WL 1387302, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2017)' and characterized it as AI-generated and non-existent.

Questions this record answers

What happened in University Mall v. Okorie et al.?

False Quotes: Case Law | Okorie attributed non-existent rulings/quotes to an existing case; Court noted misattributed/false quotation tied to Kaepa, Inc. v. Achilles Corp. Outcome: Civil contempt.

Why does University Mall v. Okorie et al. matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about University Mall v. Okorie et al.?

Which source supports this University Mall v. Okorie et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.