HomeCasesJohnny Fuselier v. John S. Riscassi

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Johnny Fuselier v. John S. Riscassi

S.D. Mississippi · May 1, 2026

MS / federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authoritycivil rights

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Rodriguez v. It’s Just Lunch, Int’l, 2013 WL 12173926 (5th Cir. 2013)', which the Court found appears fictitious; reporter number belonged to a different N.D. Cal. opinion and the caption matched an S.D.N.Y. case. Court ordered counsel to produce the opinion. Outcome: Admonishment. Order to show cause is here.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Admonishment; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving Fastcase; Google AI with Admonishment in S.D. Mississippi, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving Fastcase; Google AI with Admonishment in S.D. Mississippi, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

MississippiSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtS.D. Mississippi

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit5th Circuit

DateMay 1, 2026

AI toolFastcase; Google AI

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeAdmonishment

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

Fastcase; Google AI is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Admonishment

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Rodriguez v. It’s Just Lunch, Int’l, 2013 WL 12173926 (5th Cir. 2013)', which the Court found appears fictitious; reporter number belonged to a different N.D. Cal. opinion and the caption matched an S.D.N.Y. case. Court ordered counsel to produce the opinion.
False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel quoted the Supreme Court as saying political slogans are 'nondisruptive by nature', inserting the word 'by' and citing an incorrect page/syllabus; Court found the quote altered and not used in Mansky.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel mischaracterized Mansky's holding as unequivocally establishing that wearing political slogans is nondisruptive, citing the syllabus rather than the opinion; Court noted Mansky qualified that nondisruptive observations may not apply in certain contexts (e.g., polling places).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Johnny Fuselier v. John S. Riscassi?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Rodriguez v. It’s Just Lunch, Int’l, 2013 WL 12173926 (5th Cir. 2013)', which the Court found appears fictitious; reporter number belonged to a different N.D. Cal. opinion and the caption matched an S.D.N.Y. case. Court ordered counsel to produce the opinion. Outcome: Admonishment. Order to show cause is here.
Why does Johnny Fuselier v. John S. Riscassi matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving Fastcase; Google AI with Admonishment in S.D. Mississippi, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Johnny Fuselier v. John S. Riscassi?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Johnny Fuselier v. John S. Riscassi summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Yuri Petrini v. City of Biloxi, Mississippi, et al.S.D. Mississippi · Jun 30, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Pauliah v. University of Mississippi Medical CenterS.D. Mississippi · Dec 30, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes University Mall v. Okorie et al.S.D. Mississippi · Oct 22, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Latasha Hill v. Auto Club Family Insurance CompanyS.D. Mississippi · Sep 17, 2025same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Blake Lewis v. Entergy Mississippi, LLCS.D. Mississippi · Sep 3, 2025same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Malone-Bey v. Lauderdale County School BoardS.D. Mississippi · Jul 25, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Record details

MississippiSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtS.D. Mississippi

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit5th Circuit

DateMay 1, 2026

AI toolFastcase; Google AI

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeAdmonishment

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Counsel quoted the Supreme Court as saying political slogans are 'nondisruptive by nature', inserting the word 'by' and citing an incorrect page/syllabus; Court found the quote altered and not used in Mansky.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel mischaracterized Mansky's holding as unequivocally establishing that wearing political slogans is nondisruptive, citing the syllabus rather than the opinion; Court noted Mansky qualified that nondisruptive observations may not apply in certain contexts (e.g., polling places).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Johnny Fuselier v. John S. Riscassi?

Why does Johnny Fuselier v. John S. Riscassi matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Johnny Fuselier v. John S. Riscassi?

Which source supports this Johnny Fuselier v. John S. Riscassi summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.