AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Nov 2, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 28, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesXX v. YY
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 65/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

XX v. YY

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0). What AI Vortex adds.

Cite this record

CA Ohio · Oct 8, 2025

OH / stateEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authoritytortNone Adjudicated
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'White v. Gainer, No. 06-C-367, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27813 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 9, 2007)'; the court stated that this case does not exist. Outcome: Court rejected reliance on the cited authorities. 2025-Ohio-4649

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Court rejected reliance on the cited authorities. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Court rejected reliance on the cited authorities in CA Ohio. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'White v. Gainer, No. 06-C-367, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27813 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 9, 2007)'; the court stated that this case does not exist. Outcome: Court rejected reliance on the cited authorities. 2025-Ohio-4649

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Court rejected reliance on the cited authorities in CA Ohio. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

OhioSingle-state evidence scope
Explore OHOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtCA Ohio
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit6th Circuit
DateOct 8, 2025
AI toolNo tool named in source
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeCourt rejected reliance on the cited authorities
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Court rejected reliance on the cited authorities

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'White v. Gainer, No. 06-C-367, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27813 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 9, 2007)'; the court stated that this case does not exist.
  2. Misrepresented: Case Law | Court observed that a majority of cases cited by appellant 'either do not exist or do not stand for what he claims they do,' indicating multiple nonexisting or misrepresented citations.

Questions this record answers

What happened in XX v. YY?
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'White v. Gainer, No. 06-C-367, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27813 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 9, 2007)'; the court stated that this case does not exist. Outcome: Court rejected reliance on the cited authorities. 2025-Ohio-4649
Why does XX v. YY matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Court rejected reliance on the cited authorities in CA Ohio. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about XX v. YY?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. No underlying public source link is currently recorded. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this XX v. YY summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin AI Hallucination Cases Database. It is classified as source link missing; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

In re T.F., P.F., and S.S. Minor ChildrenCA Ohio · Nov 25, 2025same court · pro se + fake citationsSouth Central Ohio Job and Family Services v. Corey MasonCA Ohio · Nov 25, 2025same court · pro se + fake citationsState v. DavisCA Ohio · Aug 3, 2026same court · pro se + misrepresented authorityState ex rel. Soretha Marie Eldridge v. Judge Ashley KilbaneCA Ohio · Oct 31, 2025same court · pro se + fake citationsBoersma v. DavenportCA Oregon · May 6, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: No tool named in sourceState v. ColemanCA Ohio · Mar 20, 2026same court · fake citations + appellate

This record involves a self-represented party. See all pro se litigant AI hallucination decisions in the corpus, with counts by year, country and outcome.

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.