HomeCasesYoon v. The Owners, Strata Plan NW86

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.

Corpus matter record

Yoon v. The Owners, Strata Plan NW86

Civil Resolution Tribunal · Jul 24, 2026

Canada Editorial impact: low pro se fake citations trial None Adjudicated

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent cited non-existent court decisions (outside the CRT) in its submissions; tribunal found these to be fabricated and disregarded them.

Why the court cared: The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Civil Resolution Tribunal. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent cited non-existent court decisions (outside the CRT) in its submissions; tribunal found these to be fabricated and disregarded them.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Civil Resolution Tribunal. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtCivil Resolution Tribunal

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateJul 24, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent cited non-existent court decisions (outside the CRT) in its submissions; tribunal found these to be fabricated and disregarded them.
Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent cited several non-existent Civil Resolution Tribunal decisions in its submissions; tribunal identified these as likely AI-generated fabrications and did not rely on them.
Fabricated: Legal Norm | Respondent cited non-existent sections of legislation; tribunal found these references were likely hallucinations and did not treat them as valid legal authority.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Yoon v. The Owners, Strata Plan NW86?: Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent cited non-existent court decisions (outside the CRT) in its submissions; tribunal found these to be fabricated and disregarded them.
Why does Yoon v. The Owners, Strata Plan NW86 matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Civil Resolution Tribunal. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Yoon v. The Owners, Strata Plan NW86?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Yoon v. The Owners, Strata Plan NW86 summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Chen v. The Owners, Strata Plan LMS3094Civil Resolution Tribunal · May 27, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Miao v. BouchardCivil Resolution Tribunal · Mar 9, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Blaser v. CampbellCivil Resolution Tribunal · Jul 15, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Maxwell v. WestJet Airlines Ltd.Civil Resolution Tribunal · Aug 15, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Geismayr v. The Owners, Strata Plan KAS 1970Civil Resolution Tribunal · Feb 14, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations AQ v. BWCivil Resolution Tribunal · Jul 4, 2025same court · pro se + trial

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Corpus snapshot checked Aug 2, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Aug 2, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 31, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open Civil Resolution Tribunal profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent cited non-existent court decisions (outside the CRT) in its submissions; tribunal found these to be fabricated and disregarded them.

Operational lesson

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent cited non-existent court decisions (outside the CRT) in its submissions; tribunal found these to be fabricated and disregarded them.

Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent cited several non-existent Civil Resolution Tribunal decisions in its submissions; tribunal identified these as likely AI-generated fabrications and did not rely on them.

Fabricated: Legal Norm | Respondent cited non-existent sections of legislation; tribunal found these references were likely hallucinations and did not treat them as valid legal authority.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Yoon v. The Owners, Strata Plan NW86?

Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent cited non-existent court decisions (outside the CRT) in its submissions; tribunal found these to be fabricated and disregarded them.

Why does Yoon v. The Owners, Strata Plan NW86 matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Yoon v. The Owners, Strata Plan NW86?

Which source supports this Yoon v. The Owners, Strata Plan NW86 summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.