Yoon v. The Owners, Strata Plan NW86
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Courtready; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
Civil Resolution Tribunal · Jul 24, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent cited non-existent court decisions (outside the CRT) in its submissions; tribunal found these to be fabricated and disregarded them.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Civil Resolution Tribunal. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent cited non-existent court decisions (outside the CRT) in its submissions; tribunal found these to be fabricated and disregarded them.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Civil Resolution Tribunal. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent cited non-existent court decisions (outside the CRT) in its submissions; tribunal found these to be fabricated and disregarded them.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent cited several non-existent Civil Resolution Tribunal decisions in its submissions; tribunal identified these as likely AI-generated fabrications and did not rely on them.
- Fabricated: Legal Norm | Respondent cited non-existent sections of legislation; tribunal found these references were likely hallucinations and did not treat them as valid legal authority.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Yoon v. The Owners, Strata Plan NW86?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent cited non-existent court decisions (outside the CRT) in its submissions; tribunal found these to be fabricated and disregarded them.
- Why does Yoon v. The Owners, Strata Plan NW86 matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Civil Resolution Tribunal. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Yoon v. The Owners, Strata Plan NW86?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Yoon v. The Owners, Strata Plan NW86 summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.