Yoon v. The Owners, Strata Plan NW86
Civil Resolution Tribunal · Jul 24, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent cited non-existent court decisions (outside the CRT) in its submissions; tribunal found these to be fabricated and disregarded them.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Civil Resolution Tribunal. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent cited non-existent court decisions (outside the CRT) in its submissions; tribunal found these to be fabricated and disregarded them.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Civil Resolution Tribunal. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent cited non-existent court decisions (outside the CRT) in its submissions; tribunal found these to be fabricated and disregarded them.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent cited several non-existent Civil Resolution Tribunal decisions in its submissions; tribunal identified these as likely AI-generated fabrications and did not rely on them.
- Fabricated: Legal Norm | Respondent cited non-existent sections of legislation; tribunal found these references were likely hallucinations and did not treat them as valid legal authority.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Yoon v. The Owners, Strata Plan NW86?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Respondent cited non-existent court decisions (outside the CRT) in its submissions; tribunal found these to be fabricated and disregarded them.
- Why does Yoon v. The Owners, Strata Plan NW86 matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Civil Resolution Tribunal. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Yoon v. The Owners, Strata Plan NW86?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Yoon v. The Owners, Strata Plan NW86 summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.