HomeCasesYour Home Partners v. Kellichan

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Your Home Partners v. Kellichan

Sheriffdom of Tayside · Jan 19, 2026

GBEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationscontracttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Legal Norm | Claimant lodged extract purporting to be 'Small Claims (Scotland) Rules – Section 41a' which does not exist; court determined the rule was fabricated. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Legal Norm | Claimant lodged extract purporting to be 'Small Claims (Scotland) Rules – Section 41a' which does not exist; court determined the rule was fabricated. || Fabricated: Legal Norm | Claimant lodged extract purporting to be 'Interest on Debts (Scotland) Act 1985 – Section 1' which does not exist; court determined the statute/extract was fabricated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Claimant cited FtT determination reference FTS/HPC/CV/19/3145; court and FtT found no such decision exists. || Fabricated: Case Law | Claimant cited FtT determination reference FTS/HPC/CV/20/0624; court and FtT found no such decision exists.
Why it matters now: Fabricated statutes are now appearing alongside fake cases—verify the existence of the statute section, not just the case number.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Legal Norm | Claimant lodged extract purporting to be 'Small Claims (Scotland) Rules – Section 41a' which does not exist; court determined the rule was fabricated. Outcome: Warning.

Operational lesson

Fabricated statutes are now appearing alongside fake cases—verify the existence of the statute section, not just the case number.

Record details

CourtSheriffdom of Tayside

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateJan 19, 2026

AI toolUnidentified

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Legal Norm | Claimant lodged extract purporting to be 'Small Claims (Scotland) Rules – Section 41a' which does not exist; court determined the rule was fabricated.
Fabricated: Legal Norm | Claimant lodged extract purporting to be 'Interest on Debts (Scotland) Act 1985 – Section 1' which does not exist; court determined the statute/extract was fabricated.
Fabricated: Case Law | Claimant cited FtT determination reference FTS/HPC/CV/19/3145; court and FtT found no such decision exists.
Fabricated: Case Law | Claimant cited FtT determination reference FTS/HPC/CV/20/0624; court and FtT found no such decision exists.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Your Home Partners v. Kellichan?: Fabricated: Legal Norm | Claimant lodged extract purporting to be 'Small Claims (Scotland) Rules – Section 41a' which does not exist; court determined the rule was fabricated. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Your Home Partners v. Kellichan matter for legal AI risk?: Fabricated statutes are now appearing alongside fake cases—verify the existence of the statute section, not just the case number.
What does the public record establish about Your Home Partners v. Kellichan?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Your Home Partners v. Kellichan summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Mary McGreevy v. Adam WitkinSC Oregon · Jun 4, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified Joshua Harris v. Pinnacle Bank (2)N.D. Mississippi · May 7, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified Morton v. CherkaouiB.C. CA · May 1, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified Mazac v. MuiseNS SC · Apr 28, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified Brian Smith v. TD Auto Finance LLC, et al.N.D. Mississippi · Apr 14, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified Ellen Michaelis v. Wilmington Savings Fund SocietySC New York · Apr 3, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Legal Norm | Claimant lodged extract purporting to be 'Small Claims (Scotland) Rules – Section 41a' which does not exist; court determined the rule was fabricated. Outcome: Warning.

Operational lesson

Fabricated statutes are now appearing alongside fake cases—verify the existence of the statute section, not just the case number.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Legal Norm | Claimant lodged extract purporting to be 'Small Claims (Scotland) Rules – Section 41a' which does not exist; court determined the rule was fabricated.

Fabricated: Legal Norm | Claimant lodged extract purporting to be 'Interest on Debts (Scotland) Act 1985 – Section 1' which does not exist; court determined the statute/extract was fabricated.

Fabricated: Case Law | Claimant cited FtT determination reference FTS/HPC/CV/19/3145; court and FtT found no such decision exists.

Fabricated: Case Law | Claimant cited FtT determination reference FTS/HPC/CV/20/0624; court and FtT found no such decision exists.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Your Home Partners v. Kellichan?

Fabricated: Legal Norm | Claimant lodged extract purporting to be 'Small Claims (Scotland) Rules – Section 41a' which does not exist; court determined the rule was fabricated. Outcome: Warning.

Why does Your Home Partners v. Kellichan matter for legal AI risk?

Fabricated statutes are now appearing alongside fake cases—verify the existence of the statute section, not just the case number.

What does the public record establish about Your Home Partners v. Kellichan?

Which source supports this Your Home Partners v. Kellichan summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.