HomeCasesZero Point MGMT v. Chase Bank/JP Morgan Chase Co.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Zero Point MGMT v. Chase Bank/JP Morgan Chase Co.

S.D. New York · Nov 24, 2025

NY / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authoritycontract

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Weaver v. United States, 98 Fed. Cl. 680, 684 (2011)'; the Court's research found no such case and identified it as a fake citation. Outcome: Non-lawyer trustee barred from proceeding pro se.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Weaver v. United States, 98 Fed. Cl. 680, 684 (2011)'; the Court's research found no such case and identified it as a fake citation. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp. v. Mendel, 894 F. Supp. 2d 107, 111 (E.D.N.Y. 2012)'; the Court found this case does not appear to exist. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on Jordan v. Fox, Rothschild, O’Brien & Frankel, 20 F.3d 1250 (3d Cir. 1994) but the Court found the case exists and does not support the proposition cited—holding was mischaracterized.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in S.D. New York, with the listed outcome: Non-lawyer trustee barred from proceeding pro se.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in S.D. New York, with the listed outcome: Non-lawyer trustee barred from proceeding pro se.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtS.D. New York

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit2nd Circuit

DateNov 24, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeNon-lawyer trustee barred from proceeding pro se

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Non-lawyer trustee barred from proceeding pro se

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Weaver v. United States, 98 Fed. Cl. 680, 684 (2011)'; the Court's research found no such case and identified it as a fake citation.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp. v. Mendel, 894 F. Supp. 2d 107, 111 (E.D.N.Y. 2012)'; the Court found this case does not appear to exist.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on Jordan v. Fox, Rothschild, O’Brien & Frankel, 20 F.3d 1250 (3d Cir. 1994) but the Court found the case exists and does not support the proposition cited—holding was mischaracterized.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Zero Point MGMT v. Chase Bank/JP Morgan Chase Co.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Weaver v. United States, 98 Fed. Cl. 680, 684 (2011)'; the Court's research found no such case and identified it as a fake citation. Outcome: Non-lawyer trustee barred from proceeding pro se.
Why does Zero Point MGMT v. Chase Bank/JP Morgan Chase Co. matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in S.D. New York, with the listed outcome: Non-lawyer trustee barred from proceeding pro se.
What does the public record establish about Zero Point MGMT v. Chase Bank/JP Morgan Chase Co.?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Zero Point MGMT v. Chase Bank/JP Morgan Chase Co. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Sana Hazina Butler v. Fidelity Management & Research Company LLCS.D. New York · Apr 30, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Saregama India Ltd. v. B.A., et al.S.D. New York · Dec 3, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Tameer Peak v. Onika Tanya Maraj-Petty, et al.S.D. New York · Nov 26, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Romero v. Goldman Sachs Bank USAS.D. New York · Jun 25, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Fecteau v. Safety National Casualty CorporationS.D. New York · Mar 25, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Avalon Holdings Corp. v. Guy GentileS.D. New York · Jan 22, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in S.D. New York, with the listed outcome: Non-lawyer trustee barred from proceeding pro se.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtS.D. New York

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit2nd Circuit

DateNov 24, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeNon-lawyer trustee barred from proceeding pro se

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Weaver v. United States, 98 Fed. Cl. 680, 684 (2011)'; the Court's research found no such case and identified it as a fake citation.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp. v. Mendel, 894 F. Supp. 2d 107, 111 (E.D.N.Y. 2012)'; the Court found this case does not appear to exist.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on Jordan v. Fox, Rothschild, O’Brien & Frankel, 20 F.3d 1250 (3d Cir. 1994) but the Court found the case exists and does not support the proposition cited—holding was mischaracterized.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Zero Point MGMT v. Chase Bank/JP Morgan Chase Co.?

Why does Zero Point MGMT v. Chase Bank/JP Morgan Chase Co. matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in S.D. New York, with the listed outcome: Non-lawyer trustee barred from proceeding pro se.

What does the public record establish about Zero Point MGMT v. Chase Bank/JP Morgan Chase Co.?

Which source supports this Zero Point MGMT v. Chase Bank/JP Morgan Chase Co. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.