Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
COUNTRY EVIDENCE REPORTAV-ER-0N05CBXGenerated September 12, 2026Evidence checked Sep 11, 2026
COUNTRY EVIDENCE REPORT

United States

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records1,394
Source linked99.8%
Known amount total$1,400,415
Recorded rangeJun 14, 2023 – Sep 9, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What patterns appear in the public records associated with United States?

AI Vortex currently links 1,394 source-linked public matters associated with United States. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (1,183), Misrepresented authority (603) and Fabricated or altered quotations (559). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (575), No adjudicated consequence recorded (351) and Monetary sanction (248). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the country.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 1,394
Sep 9, 2026Beus Gilbert PLLC v. Brigham Young University et al.D. UtahClearBrief, Claude, ChatGPT, and GeminiSource
Sep 8, 2026Asiedu v. EastlundCA MinnesotaUnidentifiedSource
Sep 8, 2026Carter v. City of BuffaloW.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Sep 8, 2026G.P. v. Jose Hernandez ArevaloW.D. WashingtonAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Sep 8, 2026Philippeaux v. United States, et al.S.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Sep 4, 2026Wurm v. Anchor Bay Packaging CorporationE.D. MichiganAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Sep 3, 2026Douglas v. Deutsche Bank National Trust CompanyD.C. Court of AppealsGoogle AISource
Sep 3, 2026Falkenstein v. NilesC.D. CaliforniaUnidentifiedSource
Sep 3, 2026Santos v. Hoboken Public School District, et al.D. New JerseyAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Sep 2, 2026Morgan Cole v. Hobby Town Unlimited, Inc.C.D. IllinoisAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.