COURT EVIDENCE REPORT

CA Arizona (1d)

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records10

Source linked100%

Known USD amount totalNone recorded

Recorded rangeMar 31, 2026 – Oct 23, 2026

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in CA Arizona (1d)?

AI Vortex currently links 10 source-linked public matters associated with CA Arizona (1d). The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (10), Misrepresented authority (5) and Fabricated or altered quotations (4). Recorded responses and outcomes include Monetary sanction (4), No adjudicated consequence recorded (2) and Warning or admonishment (2). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.

OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Fabricated authorities10 · 100%Misrepresented authority5 · 50%Fabricated or altered quotations4 · 40%

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.

RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

Monetary sanction4 · 40%No adjudicated consequence recorded2 · 20%Warning or admonishment2 · 20%Bar or professional referral1 · 10%Filing or pleading struck1 · 10%Professional discipline1 · 10%

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

Pro Se Litigant8 · 80%Lawyer2 · 20%

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

Family4 · 40%Contract2 · 20%Other2 · 20%Tort2 · 20%

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 10 of 10

Oct 23, 2026American Leadership Academy, et al. v. Kristina Sherburne, et al.CA Arizona (1d)No tool named in sourceSource

Sep 17, 2026Varela v. HauserCA Arizona (1d)No tool named in sourceSource

Aug 10, 2026WRI Summit REIT LP v. KuerschnerCA Arizona (1d)No tool named in sourceSource

Jul 23, 2026Garciduenas v. Matrix New World Engineering, Inc.CA Arizona (1d)No tool named in sourceSource

Jul 15, 2026Dineen/Shibata v. KotchkaCA Arizona (1d)UnidentifiedSource

Jun 26, 2026Barari v. BurgessCA Arizona (1d)UnidentifiedSource

Jun 22, 2026FHMC, LLC et al. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc.CA Arizona (1d)UnidentifiedSource

Jun 16, 2026Ngaruiya v. GillCA Arizona (1d)AI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jun 11, 2026Villanueva v. BowersCA Arizona (1d)UnidentifiedSource

Mar 31, 2026Hampton v. LoftonCA Arizona (1d)AI (implied, unspecified)Source

Open all matching records

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE

Related corpus profiles

Fake Citations10 shared records United States10 shared records Arizona10 shared records Misrepresented Authority5 shared records Fabricated Quotes4 shared records Monetary4 shared records

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, CA Arizona (1d) Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 27, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/ca-arizona-1d/report (last visited Oct. 27, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, October 27). CA Arizona (1d) Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 27, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/ca-arizona-1d/report
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/ca-arizona-1d/report (accessed 2026-10-27)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.