HomeCasesFHMC, LLC et al. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

FHMC, LLC et al. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc.

CA Arizona (1d) · Jun 22, 2026

AZ / stateEditorial impact: highfake citationsbar referralcontractappellate

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'Arnal v. Travelers Prop. Cas. Ins. Co.' with a 2007 LEXIS citation that the court determined does not exist in the reported form provided. Outcome: Bar Referral.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Bar Referral; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and bar referral involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Bar Referral in CA Arizona (1d), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and bar referral involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Bar Referral in CA Arizona (1d), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

ArizonaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtCA Arizona (1d)

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit9th Circuit

DateJun 22, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeBar Referral

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionYes

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Bar Referral

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'Arnal v. Travelers Prop. Cas. Ins. Co.' with a 2007 LEXIS citation that the court determined does not exist in the reported form provided.
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a nonexistent LexisNexis reporter citation for Mod. Orthopaedics of NJ v. Premera Blue Cross; court found the '2025 LX 425206 (D.N.J. Nov. 3, 2025)' reporter citation does not exist.
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a non-existent LEXIS entry for the same D.N.J. decision; court identified '2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215824 (D.N.J. Nov. 3, 2025)' as not existing.
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant relied on a purported S.D.N.Y. LEXIS decision 'Kennedy v. UnitedHealth Grp. Inc.' with a 2025 LEXIS citation which the court found does not exist.
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a Lexis citation for the federal district court order in this litigation that the court identified as nonexistent: '2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62018'.

Questions this record answers

What happened in FHMC, LLC et al. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'Arnal v. Travelers Prop. Cas. Ins. Co.' with a 2007 LEXIS citation that the court determined does not exist in the reported form provided. Outcome: Bar Referral.
Why does FHMC, LLC et al. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and bar referral involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Bar Referral in CA Arizona (1d), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about FHMC, LLC et al. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this FHMC, LLC et al. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Ngaruiya v. GillCA Arizona (1d) · Jun 16, 2026same court · fake citations + appellate Hampton v. LoftonCA Arizona (1d) · Mar 31, 2026same court · fake citations + appellate Dineen/Shibata v. KotchkaCA Arizona (1d) · Jul 15, 2026same court · fake citations + appellate Barari v. BurgessCA Arizona (1d) · Jun 26, 2026same court · fake citations + appellate Villanueva v. BowersCA Arizona (1d) · Jun 11, 2026same court · fake citations + appellate In re termination of parental rights (HK)CA Arizona · Feb 25, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + bar referral

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Record details

ArizonaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtCA Arizona (1d)

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit9th Circuit

DateJun 22, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeBar Referral

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionYes

Tracked discrepancy record

5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'Arnal v. Travelers Prop. Cas. Ins. Co.' with a 2007 LEXIS citation that the court determined does not exist in the reported form provided.

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a nonexistent LexisNexis reporter citation for Mod. Orthopaedics of NJ v. Premera Blue Cross; court found the '2025 LX 425206 (D.N.J. Nov. 3, 2025)' reporter citation does not exist.

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a non-existent LEXIS entry for the same D.N.J. decision; court identified '2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 215824 (D.N.J. Nov. 3, 2025)' as not existing.

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant relied on a purported S.D.N.Y. LEXIS decision 'Kennedy v. UnitedHealth Grp. Inc.' with a 2025 LEXIS citation which the court found does not exist.

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a Lexis citation for the federal district court order in this litigation that the court identified as nonexistent: '2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62018'.

Questions this record answers

What happened in FHMC, LLC et al. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc.?

Why does FHMC, LLC et al. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about FHMC, LLC et al. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc.?

Which source supports this FHMC, LLC et al. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.