COURT EVIDENCE REPORT

SC California

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records12

Source linked100%

Known USD amount total$4,000

Recorded rangeOct 31, 2024 – Sep 24, 2026

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in SC California?

AI Vortex currently links 12 source-linked public matters associated with SC California. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (8), Misrepresented authority (5) and Fabricated or altered quotations (4). Recorded responses and outcomes include No adjudicated consequence recorded (5), Warning or admonishment (3) and Bar or professional referral (2). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.

OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Fabricated authorities8 · 66.7%Misrepresented authority5 · 41.7%Fabricated or altered quotations4 · 33.3%

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.

RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

No adjudicated consequence recorded5 · 41.7%Warning or admonishment3 · 25%Bar or professional referral2 · 16.7%Dismissal or adverse disposition1 · 8.3%Filing or pleading struck1 · 8.3%Monetary sanction1 · 8.3%

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

Lawyer10 · 83.3%Pro Se Litigant2 · 16.7%

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

Tort4 · 33.3%Contract2 · 16.7%Administrative1 · 8.3%Landlord Tenant1 · 8.3%Other1 · 8.3%

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 12

Sep 24, 2026Cervantes v. BiancoSC CaliforniaUnidentifiedSource

Aug 20, 2026Perez v. Schaal, et al.SC CaliforniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Aug 11, 2026Meni-Silga v. State FarmSC CaliforniaIrysSource

Aug 5, 2026Southland Homes & Real Estate and Investment, LLC v. LamSC CaliforniaChatGPT and Google GeminiSource

Jul 14, 2026Salvador Guzman v. Lithia Motors, Inc., et al.SC CaliforniaUnidentifiedSource

Jan 13, 2026Heiting v. I Am Beyond LLCSC CaliforniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Nov 7, 2025Wade v. Traincareconsult, IncSC CaliforniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Oct 3, 2025Tovar v. American Automatic Fire Suppression Inc.SC CaliforniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Sep 9, 2025Ariel Mendones, et al. v. Cushman and Wakefield et alSC CaliforniaUnidentifiedSource

Aug 6, 2025Gezalayan v. BMW North American, LLCSC CaliforniaUnidentifiedSource

May 29, 2025Anita Krishnakumar et al. v. Eichler Swim and Tennis ClubSC CaliforniaAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Oct 31, 2024Churchill Funding v. 732 IndianaSC CaliforniaUnidentifiedSource

Open all matching records

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE

Related corpus profiles

United States12 shared records California12 shared records Fake Citations8 shared records Misrepresented Authority5 shared records None Adjudicated5 shared records Fabricated Quotes4 shared records

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, SC California Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 26, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/sc-california/report (last visited Oct. 26, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, October 26). SC California Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 26, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/sc-california/report
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/sc-california/report (accessed 2026-10-26)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.