HomeCasesChurchill Funding v. 732 Indiana

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Churchill Funding v. 732 Indiana

SC California · Oct 31, 2024

CA / stateEditorial impact: mediumfake citationsmisrepresented authoritycontracttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Defendants' CMC Statement cited 'California Federal Bank v. Kwong (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 1467, 1472,' which the court found does not exist; OSC to be set re false pleadings. Outcome: Order to show cause.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Order to show cause; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: OSCs for false pleadings now follow a single unverified cite; Shepardize before every CMC statement.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

OSCs for false pleadings now follow a single unverified cite; Shepardize before every CMC statement.

Record details

CaliforniaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtSC California

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit9th Circuit

DateOct 31, 2024

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeOrder to show cause

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Order to show cause

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Defendants' CMC Statement cited 'California Federal Bank v. Kwong (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 1467, 1472,' which the court found does not exist; OSC to be set re false pleadings.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendants miscited 'Security Pacific National Bank v. Wozab' as 231 Cal.App.3d at 1472-1473; the court noted the case is reported at 51 Cal.3d 991 and set an OSC re false pleadings.
Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Defendants argued plaintiff could not pursue judicial foreclosure and then seek a receiver while foreclosing under a power of sale; court disagreed, citing Miller & Starr §13:65 and CCP §564(d) that receivership is not a one-action violation.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Churchill Funding v. 732 Indiana?: Fabricated: Case Law | Defendants' CMC Statement cited 'California Federal Bank v. Kwong (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 1467, 1472,' which the court found does not exist; OSC to be set re false pleadings. Outcome: Order to show cause.
Why does Churchill Funding v. 732 Indiana matter for legal AI risk?: OSCs for false pleadings now follow a single unverified cite; Shepardize before every CMC statement.
What does the public record establish about Churchill Funding v. 732 Indiana?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Churchill Funding v. 732 Indiana summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Wade v. Traincareconsult, IncSC California · Nov 7, 2025same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Tovar v. American Automatic Fire Suppression Inc.SC California · Oct 3, 2025same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Ariel Mendones, et al. v. Cushman and Wakefield et alSC California · Sep 9, 2025same court · fake citations + contract Gezalayan v. BMW North American, LLCSC California · Aug 6, 2025same court · fake citations + trial Anita Krishnakumar et al. v. Eichler Swim and Tennis ClubSC California · May 29, 2025same court · fake citations + trial Song Dow Lee, et al. v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association, et al.C.D. California · May 7, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + misrepresented authority

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

OSCs for false pleadings now follow a single unverified cite; Shepardize before every CMC statement.

Record details

CaliforniaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtSC California

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit9th Circuit

DateOct 31, 2024

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeOrder to show cause

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Defendants' CMC Statement cited 'California Federal Bank v. Kwong (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 1467, 1472,' which the court found does not exist; OSC to be set re false pleadings.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Defendants miscited 'Security Pacific National Bank v. Wozab' as 231 Cal.App.3d at 1472-1473; the court noted the case is reported at 51 Cal.3d 991 and set an OSC re false pleadings.

Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Defendants argued plaintiff could not pursue judicial foreclosure and then seek a receiver while foreclosing under a power of sale; court disagreed, citing Miller & Starr §13:65 and CCP §564(d) that receivership is not a one-action violation.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Churchill Funding v. 732 Indiana?

Why does Churchill Funding v. 732 Indiana matter for legal AI risk?

OSCs for false pleadings now follow a single unverified cite; Shepardize before every CMC statement.

What does the public record establish about Churchill Funding v. 732 Indiana?

Which source supports this Churchill Funding v. 732 Indiana summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.