Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
STATE EVIDENCE REPORTAV-ER-1HEU9FIGenerated September 12, 2026Evidence checked Sep 11, 2026
STATE EVIDENCE REPORT

Florida

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records67
Source linked100%
Known amount total$102,751
Recorded rangeMay 8, 2024 Sep 2, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What patterns appear in the public records associated with Florida?

AI Vortex currently links 67 source-linked public matters associated with Florida. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (58), Misrepresented authority (32) and Fabricated or altered quotations (27). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (23), Bar or professional referral (14) and No adjudicated consequence recorded (14). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the state.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.
RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 67
Aug 12, 2026JMOR Properties v. Artist Alley Townhomes et al.CA Florida (4d)UnidentifiedSource
Aug 12, 2026Rose v. Arts Bonita, Inc.M.D. FloridaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jul 22, 2026Rose Lannquist Gouldy v. Timothy M. Chiasson, et al.CA Florida (4d)AI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jul 16, 2026Cames et al. v. Lowe's Home CentersM.D. FloridaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jul 13, 2026Whyte et al. v. MK United, Inc. et al.S.D. FloridaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jul 8, 2026Cynthia Hulse-Gibson v. Charlie HulseCA Florida (2d)AI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jul 1, 2026Edwards v. De Cubas & Lewis, P.A.M.D. FloridaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jun 26, 2026Jaime Alexander Davidson v. Nayeli Nadir Chang-WarnerCA Florida (6d)AI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jun 9, 2026Leafwell, Inc. v. The Doc App, Inc. (2)M.D. FloridaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.