AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
Search free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Nov 8, 2026 · Latest decision Nov 3, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesMoszkowski v. DeepGulf, Inc. and Toke Oil and Gas, S.A.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Moszkowski v. DeepGulf, Inc. and Toke Oil and Gas, S.A.

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

Cite this record

Florida (1d) · Sep 14, 2026

FL / stateEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authorityotherWarning
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | The court found that this cited case does not exist. Outcome: Warning: after affirming, the court warned the appellant that his pro se briefs were replete with case citations that either do not exist or fail to support his arguments (No. 1D2025-2912, p. 1).

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Warning: after affirming, the court warned the appellant that his pro se briefs were replete with case citations that either do not exist or fail to support his arguments (No. 1D2025-2912, p. 1). The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning: after affirming, the court warned the appellant that his pro se briefs were replete with case citations that either do not exist or fail to support his arguments (No. 1D2025-2912, p. 1) in Florida (1d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | The court found that this cited case does not exist. Outcome: Warning: after affirming, the court warned the appellant that his pro se briefs were replete with case citations that either do not exist or fail to support his arguments (No. 1D2025-2912, p. 1).

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning: after affirming, the court warned the appellant that his pro se briefs were replete with case citations that either do not exist or fail to support his arguments (No. 1D2025-2912, p. 1) in Florida (1d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

FloridaSingle-state evidence scope
Explore FLOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtFlorida (1d)
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit11th Circuit
DateSep 14, 2026
First seenSep 24, 2026 (in this dataset)
AI toolNo tool named in source
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeWarning: after affirming, the court warned the appellant that his pro se briefs were replete with case citations that either do not exist or fail to support his arguments (No. 1D2025-2912, p. 1)
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo

Corrected 2026-11-02: see the corrections log.

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Warning: after affirming, the court warned the appellant that his pro se briefs were replete with case citations that either do not exist or fail to support his arguments (No. 1D2025-2912, p. 1)

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | The court found that this cited case does not exist.
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | The court found that this cited case does not exist.
  3. Fabricated: Case Law | The court found that this cited case does not exist.
  4. Fabricated: Case Law | The court found that this cited case does not exist.
  5. Misrepresented: Case Law | The court stated that the appellant cited multiple additional existing cases that addressed unrelated issues and therefore did not support his arguments.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Moszkowski v. DeepGulf, Inc. and Toke Oil and Gas, S.A.?
Fabricated: Case Law | The court found that this cited case does not exist. Outcome: Warning: after affirming, the court warned the appellant that his pro se briefs were replete with case citations that either do not exist or fail to support his arguments (No. 1D2025-2912, p. 1).
Why does Moszkowski v. DeepGulf, Inc. and Toke Oil and Gas, S.A. matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning: after affirming, the court warned the appellant that his pro se briefs were replete with case citations that either do not exist or fail to support his arguments (No. 1D2025-2912, p. 1) in Florida (1d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Moszkowski v. DeepGulf, Inc. and Toke Oil and Gas, S.A.?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Moszkowski v. DeepGulf, Inc. and Toke Oil and Gas, S.A. summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Farag v. Persante et alM.D. Florida · Jan 26, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citationsRose v. Arts Bonita, Inc.M.D. Florida · Aug 12, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citationsPaulk v. Larva Labs, LLCS.D. Florida · Jun 18, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citationsButler v. The Travelers Indemnity CompanySC Connecticut · Oct 7, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: No tool named in sourceSanchez v. Synchrony Bank N.A.S.D. California · Oct 1, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: No tool named in sourceRobinson v. Dikeland Sewer DistrictW.D. Missouri · Sep 24, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: No tool named in sourceRollins v. Premier Motorcar GalleryN.D. Florida · Jul 30, 2025same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations

This record involves a self-represented party. See all pro se litigant AI hallucination decisions in the corpus, with counts by year, country and outcome.

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.