Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
STATE EVIDENCE REPORTAV-ER-1K887O5Generated September 12, 2026Evidence checked Sep 11, 2026
STATE EVIDENCE REPORT

Utah

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records15
Source linked100%
Known amount total$12,525
Recorded rangeMay 22, 2025 Sep 9, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What patterns appear in the public records associated with Utah?

AI Vortex currently links 15 source-linked public matters associated with Utah. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (10), Misrepresented authority (5) and Fabricated or altered quotations (4). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (7), Monetary sanction (4) and No adjudicated consequence recorded (3). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the state.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.
RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 15
Sep 9, 2026Beus Gilbert PLLC v. Brigham Young University et al.D. UtahClearBrief, Claude, ChatGPT, and GeminiSource
Aug 24, 2026Jack Ferm v. Agritech Properties, et al.D. UtahAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Aug 7, 2026Hack v. Preston et alD. UtahChatGPTSource
Jul 30, 2026Carey v. Breakell et al.D. UtahAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jul 23, 2026Hagan v. Black Diamond Experts, LLCD. UtahAI (implied, unspecified)Source
May 4, 2026Regan Wilkes, et al. v. Canyons School District, et al.D. UtahAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Mar 19, 2026Prisbrey v. PrisbreyCA UtahAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Feb 24, 2026Ryan Lee v. Capital One Bank et al.D. UtahAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Dec 4, 2025Black Oak Capital BOCA, LLC v. Paul Evans, LLC, et al.D. UtahAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Nov 5, 2025Ross Logan v. LVNV Funding et al.D. UtahAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.