HomeCasesNicholas and Barbara Moulder v. Davis School District (on behalf of M.M.)

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Nicholas and Barbara Moulder v. Davis School District (on behalf of M.M.)

D. Utah · Mar 23, 2026

UT / federalEditorial impact: mediumfake citationsfabricated quotescivil rightstrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs' briefing cited a non-existent case as legal authority; court found the case did not exist and counsel admitted failing to verify after using AI. Outcome: CLE; Monetary Sanction.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is CLE; Monetary Sanction; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: Courts pair monetary sanctions with mandatory CLE — budget for training now or pay for it after a fabrication.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Courts pair monetary sanctions with mandatory CLE — budget for training now or pay for it after a fabrication.

Record details

UtahSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Utah

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateMar 23, 2026

AI toolUnidentified

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeCLE; Monetary Sanction

Known amount$1,525

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

CLE; Monetary Sanction

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs' briefing cited a non-existent case as legal authority; court found the case did not exist and counsel admitted failing to verify after using AI.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs' briefing cited a second non-existent case as legal authority; court determined it was fabricated and counsel accepted responsibility for not verifying.
False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiffs' briefing included a non-existent quotation attributed to authority; court determined the quote did not exist and was not verified by counsel after use of AI.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Nicholas and Barbara Moulder v. Davis School District (on behalf of M.M.)?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs' briefing cited a non-existent case as legal authority; court found the case did not exist and counsel admitted failing to verify after using AI. Outcome: CLE; Monetary Sanction.
Why does Nicholas and Barbara Moulder v. Davis School District (on behalf of M.M.) matter for legal AI risk?: Courts pair monetary sanctions with mandatory CLE — budget for training now or pay for it after a fabrication.
What does the public record establish about Nicholas and Barbara Moulder v. Davis School District (on behalf of M.M.)?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Nicholas and Barbara Moulder v. Davis School District (on behalf of M.M.) summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Primerica Life Insurance Company v. Daniel Vett Finlayson; Michelle JohnsonD. Utah · Apr 22, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Black Oak Capital BOCA, LLC v. Paul Evans, LLC, et al.D. Utah · Dec 4, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Regan Wilkes, et al. v. Canyons School District, et al.D. Utah · May 4, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Khoury et al v. Intermountain Health Care Inc. et alD. Utah · Sep 30, 2025same court · fake citations + trial Jane Doe 1, et al. v. Mount Saint Mary High School CorporationW.D. Oklahoma · May 13, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: Unidentified Ifeoma Delliane Chinedu Obi v. Cook County, Illinois, et al. (1)N.D. Illinois · Apr 9, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: Unidentified

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Courts pair monetary sanctions with mandatory CLE — budget for training now or pay for it after a fabrication.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs' briefing cited a non-existent case as legal authority; court found the case did not exist and counsel admitted failing to verify after using AI.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs' briefing cited a second non-existent case as legal authority; court determined it was fabricated and counsel accepted responsibility for not verifying.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiffs' briefing included a non-existent quotation attributed to authority; court determined the quote did not exist and was not verified by counsel after use of AI.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Nicholas and Barbara Moulder v. Davis School District (on behalf of M.M.)?

Why does Nicholas and Barbara Moulder v. Davis School District (on behalf of M.M.) matter for legal AI risk?

Courts pair monetary sanctions with mandatory CLE — budget for training now or pay for it after a fabrication.

What does the public record establish about Nicholas and Barbara Moulder v. Davis School District (on behalf of M.M.)?

Which source supports this Nicholas and Barbara Moulder v. Davis School District (on behalf of M.M.) summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.