AI TOOL EVIDENCE REPORT

ChatGPT

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records143

Source linked99.3%

Known USD amount total$317,430.80

Recorded rangeApr 14, 2023 – Sep 21, 2026

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What issues and consequences appear in records that identify ChatGPT?

AI Vortex currently links 143 source-linked public matters that identify ChatGPT. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (113), Misrepresented authority (61) and Fabricated or altered quotations (47). Recorded responses and outcomes include Monetary sanction (51), No adjudicated consequence recorded (48) and Professional discipline (33). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the tool.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.

OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Fabricated authorities113 · 79%Misrepresented authority61 · 42.7%Fabricated or altered quotations47 · 32.9%

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.

RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

Monetary sanction51 · 35.7%No adjudicated consequence recorded48 · 33.6%Professional discipline33 · 23.1%Bar or professional referral24 · 16.8%Warning or admonishment22 · 15.4%Non-monetary order (CLE, community service, apology)11 · 7.7%

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

Lawyer81 · 56.6%Pro Se Litigant53 · 37.1%Expert5 · 3.5%Judge1 · 0.7%

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

Administrative20 · 14%Contract15 · 10.5%Tort14 · 9.8%Civil Rights13 · 9.1%Employment12 · 8.4%

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 143

Sep 21, 2026NK (Namibia) v Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentUpper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)ChatGPTSource

Sep 14, 2026Tiekert v. Village of Mamaroneck, et al.S.D. New YorkChatGPTSource

Sep 9, 2026Beus Gilbert PLLC v. Brigham Young University et al.D. UtahClaude, ChatGPT, and GeminiSource

Aug 24, 2026Michael L. Ruiz v. Magellan Financial & Insurance Services (2)D. ArizonaChatGPTSource

Aug 21, 2026Unspecified murder appeal (Las Cruces area)New Mexico SCChatGPTSource

Aug 18, 2026Joann LeDoux v. Outliers, Inc. (2)W.D. WashingtonClaude and ChatGPTSource

Aug 14, 2026Brankle v. SchmellCA IndianaChatGPTSource

Aug 12, 2026IN RE: Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability LitigationD. ArizonaChatGPTSource

Aug 11, 2026A. P. v. S. K.CA QuébecChatGPTSource

Aug 7, 2026Hack v. Preston et alD. UtahChatGPTSource

Aug 5, 2026Southland Homes & Real Estate and Investment, LLC v. LamSC CaliforniaChatGPT and Google GeminiSource

Aug 5, 2026Ulish Kerry Terrace Booker, III v. U.S. Bank National AssociationD. ConnecticutGemini Pro; Perplexity; Cetient Legal AI; ChatGPTSource

Open all matching records

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE

Related corpus profiles

Fake Citations113 shared records United States80 shared records Misrepresented Authority61 shared records Monetary51 shared records None Adjudicated48 shared records Fabricated Quotes47 shared records

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, ChatGPT Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 27, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/tools/chatgpt/report (last visited Oct. 27, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, October 27). ChatGPT Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 27, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/tools/chatgpt/report
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/tools/chatgpt/report (accessed 2026-10-27)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.