Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
AI TOOL EVIDENCE REPORTAV-ER-0JFGI1WGenerated September 12, 2026Evidence checked Sep 11, 2026
AI TOOL EVIDENCE REPORT

CoCounsel

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records8
Source linked100%
Known amount total$87,698
Recorded rangeMar 18, 2025 Sep 2, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What issues and consequences appear in records that identify CoCounsel?

AI Vortex currently links 8 source-linked public matters that identify CoCounsel. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (7), Misrepresented authority (6) and Fabricated or altered quotations (4). Recorded responses and outcomes include Monetary sanction (4), Warning or admonishment (4) and Professional discipline (3). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the tool.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.
RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 8 of 8
Apr 28, 2026Anthony C. Hill v. Workday, Inc. (2)N.D. CaliforniaCoCounselSource
Apr 3, 2026United States v. Farris6th Cir. CAWestlaw CoCounselSource
Feb 12, 2026CVTEK, LLC (B-423943; B-423943.2)GAOWestlaw CoCounselSource
Sep 5, 2025Anthony C. Hill v. Workday, Inc. (1)N.D. CaliforniaCoCounselSource
May 6, 2025Lacey v. State Farm General InsuranceC.D. CaliforniaCoCounsel, Westlaw Precision, Google GeminiSource
Mar 18, 2025Williams v. Capital One BankD. DCCoCounselSource
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.