Public trackerCorpus refreshed Sep 12, 2026 · Latest decision Sep 10, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
CC
Source-linked corpus view

CoCounsel

A professional legal AI assistant designed for research, analysis, drafting, and document-centered legal workflows. CoCounsel appears in 8 of 2,039 public corpus records (0.4%). This page describes the recorded dataset, not an incidence rate, prevalence of AI use, or a prediction of future outcomes.

ProviderThomson Reuters
Product categoryLegal AI assistant
Product referenceOfficial product site
Evidence boundaryNamed only where recorded
Matched records8
Corpus denominator2,039
Source linked100%
Latest trackedSep 2, 2026
Evidence-based answer

What issues and consequences appear in records that identify CoCounsel?

AI Vortex currently links 8 source-linked public matters that identify CoCounsel. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (7), Misrepresented authority (6) and Fabricated or altered quotations (4). Recorded responses and outcomes include Monetary sanction (4), Warning or admonishment (4) and Professional discipline (3). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the tool.

Every count below links to the exact matching records. The linked source, subsequent docket history, and local procedural context remain controlling.

Leading issue signalFabricated authorities7 records
Leading recorded responseMonetary sanction4 records
Known numeric amounts$87,6983 known · 1 unquantified
Recorded date rangeMar 18, 2025through Sep 2, 2026
Observed issue mix

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within a single matter.

Recorded consequences

How did courts or authorities respond?

Response categories can overlap and do not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

Participant context

Who appears in these matters?

Matter context

Which practice areas are represented?

Attribution status

How is AI involvement recorded?

Unspecified attribution is not evidence that a particular vendor was used.

Corpus evolution

When were these matters recorded?

Public records in this view

Showing the most recent 8 of 8 matching records.

Open all matching records

Scope and limitation

This page groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish a judge’s general practices or sanction rate. For every entity type, the view is not a comparison against unobserved proceedings.

Product names and marks identify recorded tools only. AI Vortex does not imply vendor affiliation, endorsement, product-wide failure rates, or involvement beyond the linked public records.

Indexing and evidence status

This public entity profile is indexable and meets the evidence-depth baseline of at least 3 source-linked records.