Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 91/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Fabricated: Case Law | Supplemental protest included citations to decisions that could not be located or matched to the provided B-numbers/CPD citations; GAO was unable to find the cited authorities. Outcome: Warning.
Why the court cared
Fabricated: Case Law | Supplemental protest included citations to decisions that could not be located or matched to the provided B-numbers/CPD citations; GAO was unable to find the cited authorities. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Some cited decisions that were located did not state the propositions for which the protester relied on them (AI produced citations that mischaracterized authority).
Why it matters now
CoCounsel and Westlaw AI output is not self-verifying; pull and read every case before filing.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Supplemental protest included citations to decisions that could not be located or matched to the provided B-numbers/CPD citations; GAO was unable to find the cited authorities. Outcome: Warning.
Operational lesson
CoCounsel and Westlaw AI output is not self-verifying; pull and read every case before filing.
Record details
CourtGAO
Jurisdictionfederal
CircuitNot recorded
DateFeb 12, 2026
WE
AI toolWestlaw CoCounsel
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
Westlaw CoCounsel is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Warning
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
Fabricated: Case Law | Supplemental protest included citations to decisions that could not be located or matched to the provided B-numbers/CPD citations; GAO was unable to find the cited authorities.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Some cited decisions that were located did not state the propositions for which the protester relied on them (AI produced citations that mischaracterized authority).
Questions this record answers
What happened in CVTEK, LLC (B-423943; B-423943.2)?
Fabricated: Case Law | Supplemental protest included citations to decisions that could not be located or matched to the provided B-numbers/CPD citations; GAO was unable to find the cited authorities. Outcome: Warning.
Why does CVTEK, LLC (B-423943; B-423943.2) matter for legal AI risk?
CoCounsel and Westlaw AI output is not self-verifying; pull and read every case before filing.
What does the public record establish about CVTEK, LLC (B-423943; B-423943.2)?
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this CVTEK, LLC (B-423943; B-423943.2) summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.