Corpus analyticsThe public record,
The public record,
measured honestly.
Understand the legal AI risk landscape in seconds. Explore trends, sources, attribution, and consequences, then inspect the records behind every signal.
Current view9 of 2,215 records
failures
Open data table Leading failures
Counts use the current filter set. Select a row to inspect the underlying public records.
How AI involvement is recorded
AI implied or unspecified5
Tool unidentified3
Named tool recorded1
One primary result per matter
Warning or court intervention8
Known monetary consequence1
Most represented jurisdictions
Traceability of this view
Publisher document archive9 100%
Cross-tab analysis
Compare two recorded dimensions
Cells count matched matters. Failure and consequence tags can overlap, so row and column totals are not mutually exclusive.
Matching records
Open full directory Preview the evidence behind this view
DateCaseCourtToolAmount
Sep 24, 2026Adams v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois at Chicago et al.N.D. IllinoisNo tool named in source—Jun 23, 2026Compania General de Combustibles S.A., et al. v. RGR Global Logistics, LLC, et al.S.D. TexasAI (implied, unspecified)—Jun 8, 2026Sinclair v. Capital One Financial Corp.D. New JerseyAI (implied, unspecified)—May 13, 2026Joseph Guy v. AFGEN.D. CaliforniaClaude—May 11, 2026DeVore v. McCombieN.D. IllinoisNo tool named in source—Mar 31, 2026Quandel Construction Group, Inc. v. Hunt Construction Group, Inc.S.D. OhioNo tool named in source—