Corpus analyticsThe public record,
The public record,
measured honestly.
Understand the legal AI risk landscape in seconds. Explore trends, sources, attribution, and consequences, then inspect the records behind every signal.
Current view161 of 2,038 records
failures
Open data table Leading failures
Counts use the current filter set. Select a row to inspect the underlying public records.
How AI involvement is recorded
AI implied or unspecified59
Named tool recorded53
Tool unidentified49
One primary result per matter
Known monetary consequence102
Professional or bar consequence59
Most represented jurisdictions
Traceability of this view
Publisher document archive145 90%
Secondary or other source13 8%
Source link missing2 1%
Docket or document mirror1 1%
Cross-tab analysis
Compare two recorded dimensions
Cells count matched matters. Failure and consequence tags can overlap, so row and column totals are not mutually exclusive.
Matching records
Open full directory Preview the evidence behind this view
DateCaseCourtToolAmount
Sep 2, 2026Morgan Cole v. Hobby Town Unlimited, Inc.C.D. IllinoisAI (implied, unspecified)—Aug 25, 2026Solicitors Regulation Authority Ltd v Abhishek KumarSolicitors Disciplinary TribunalUnidentified—Aug 24, 2026Michael L. Ruiz v. Magellan Financial & Insurance Services (2)D. ArizonaChatGPT—Aug 21, 2026Capital Standard, LLC v. U.S. Bank National AssociationCA Florida (2d)Unidentified$1.5KAug 21, 2026Unspecified murder appeal (Las Cruces area)New Mexico SCChatGPT$5.0KAug 12, 2026Garry Chapman v. City of Priceville, et al.N.D. AlabamaAI (implied, unspecified)—