Public trackerCorpus refreshed Nov 3, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 29, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesAbuzaid v Almayouf
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Abuzaid v Almayouf

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

Cite this record

CA New York (1d) · Oct 27, 2026

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | The defendant cited Emigrant Mtg. Co. v St. Francis, 131 AD3d 827, but the court found that no case appeared at that citation and that the case apparently did not exist. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Warning. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning in CA New York (1d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | The defendant cited Emigrant Mtg. Co. v St. Francis, 131 AD3d 827, but the court found that no case appeared at that citation and that the case apparently did not exist. Outcome: Warning.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning in CA New York (1d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope
Explore NYOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtCA New York (1d)
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit2nd Circuit
DateOct 27, 2026
AI toolNo tool named in source
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | The defendant cited Emigrant Mtg. Co. v St. Francis, 131 AD3d 827, but the court found that no case appeared at that citation and that the case apparently did not exist.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Abuzaid v Almayouf?
Fabricated: Case Law | The defendant cited Emigrant Mtg. Co. v St. Francis, 131 AD3d 827, but the court found that no case appeared at that citation and that the case apparently did not exist. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Abuzaid v Almayouf matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning in CA New York (1d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Abuzaid v Almayouf?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Abuzaid v Almayouf summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Before the next filing goes out, review the workflow behind it.

These records show where AI-assisted filings went wrong. AI Vortex works with law firms and legal teams on one AI-assisted workflow at a time: who reviews the output, who signs, and what source trail it leaves. Operations design, not legal advice.

Review a workflow