HomeCasesA.M., F.A. c/ C.N.H y otros

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

A.M., F.A. c/ C.N.H y otros

CA Río Negro · Dec 12, 2025

ArgentinaEditorial impact: lowfake citationsmisrepresented authoritytortappellate

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this STJ Río Negro decision as supporting objective liability; court could not locate the precedent and determined it to be nonexistent. Outcome: Admonishment.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this STJ Río Negro decision as supporting objective liability; court could not locate the precedent and determined it to be nonexistent. || Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this STJ Río Negro decision; court was unable to find it and treated it as a non-existent AI-generated citation. || Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this STJ Río Negro decision; court could not locate it and concluded it was a fabricated citation likely produced by generative AI. || Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this STJ Río Negro decision; court's search found no trace of the precedent and characterized it as an AI 'hallucination'. || Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited a provincial/circuit civil appellate decision 'Mosca c/ Vilches' (CNCiv Sala B) as binding support; court could not locate that decision in official repositories and treated it as nonexistent. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel cited CSJN Fallos 308:1109 as supporting the proposition; court found the cited CSJN decision (Honorio Juan Luján) exists but determined it was unrelated to the proposition invoked (misuse/misrepresentation of precedent).
Why it matters now: Argentine appellate courts are admonishing counsel for AI hallucinations on the record; admonishments stay published and traceable.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this STJ Río Negro decision as supporting objective liability; court could not locate the precedent and determined it to be nonexistent. Outcome: Admonishment.

Operational lesson

Argentine appellate courts are admonishing counsel for AI hallucinations on the record; admonishments stay published and traceable.

Record details

CourtCA Río Negro

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateDec 12, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeAdmonishment

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Admonishment

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this STJ Río Negro decision as supporting objective liability; court could not locate the precedent and determined it to be nonexistent.
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this STJ Río Negro decision; court was unable to find it and treated it as a non-existent AI-generated citation.
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this STJ Río Negro decision; court could not locate it and concluded it was a fabricated citation likely produced by generative AI.
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this STJ Río Negro decision; court's search found no trace of the precedent and characterized it as an AI 'hallucination'.
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited a provincial/circuit civil appellate decision 'Mosca c/ Vilches' (CNCiv Sala B) as binding support; court could not locate that decision in official repositories and treated it as nonexistent.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel cited CSJN Fallos 308:1109 as supporting the proposition; court found the cited CSJN decision (Honorio Juan Luján) exists but determined it was unrelated to the proposition invoked (misuse/misrepresentation of precedent).

Questions this record answers

What happened in A.M., F.A. c/ C.N.H y otros?: Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this STJ Río Negro decision as supporting objective liability; court could not locate the precedent and determined it to be nonexistent. Outcome: Admonishment.
Why does A.M., F.A. c/ C.N.H y otros matter for legal AI risk?: Argentine appellate courts are admonishing counsel for AI hallucinations on the record; admonishments stay published and traceable.
What does the public record establish about A.M., F.A. c/ C.N.H y otros?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this A.M., F.A. c/ C.N.H y otros summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Matthew Merz v. Harlyn Jenkins, Jillane Baros, Melinda Finn‑KamerathCA Washington · Jun 15, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Shaddai Harris v. Nadia Lyotard and Mitchell SadlerCA Texas · Jun 12, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Christ Apostolic Temple, Inc., Dwight Reed and Jordan Reed v. Demetrius Sinegal, et al.CA Iowa · May 27, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Simmons v. Shahidul IslamCA Tennessee · May 21, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Nikko D’Ambrosio v. Meta Platforms Inc.7th Cir. CA · May 15, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Boersma v. DavenportCA Oregon · May 6, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this STJ Río Negro decision as supporting objective liability; court could not locate the precedent and determined it to be nonexistent. Outcome: Admonishment.

Operational lesson

Argentine appellate courts are admonishing counsel for AI hallucinations on the record; admonishments stay published and traceable.

Tracked discrepancy record

6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this STJ Río Negro decision as supporting objective liability; court could not locate the precedent and determined it to be nonexistent.

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this STJ Río Negro decision; court was unable to find it and treated it as a non-existent AI-generated citation.

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this STJ Río Negro decision; court could not locate it and concluded it was a fabricated citation likely produced by generative AI.

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this STJ Río Negro decision; court's search found no trace of the precedent and characterized it as an AI 'hallucination'.

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited a provincial/circuit civil appellate decision 'Mosca c/ Vilches' (CNCiv Sala B) as binding support; court could not locate that decision in official repositories and treated it as nonexistent.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Counsel cited CSJN Fallos 308:1109 as supporting the proposition; court found the cited CSJN decision (Honorio Juan Luján) exists but determined it was unrelated to the proposition invoked (misuse/misrepresentation of precedent).

Questions this record answers

What happened in A.M., F.A. c/ C.N.H y otros?

Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited this STJ Río Negro decision as supporting objective liability; court could not locate the precedent and determined it to be nonexistent. Outcome: Admonishment.

Why does A.M., F.A. c/ C.N.H y otros matter for legal AI risk?

Argentine appellate courts are admonishing counsel for AI hallucinations on the record; admonishments stay published and traceable.

What does the public record establish about A.M., F.A. c/ C.N.H y otros?

Which source supports this A.M., F.A. c/ C.N.H y otros summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.