Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Anonymous v. Anonymous
Israel · Apr 29, 2025
IsraelEditorial impact: lowfake citationsmisrepresented authorityfamilytrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's counsel cited several Family Court decisions in the complaint that do not exist; the court could not locate them in legal databases and accepted they were AI-generated. Outcome: Petition dismissed in limine; Plaintiff’s counsel ordered to pay ₪1,500 in personal costs to the state and ₪3,500 to the opposing party.
- Why the court cared
- The judge found that legal pleadings are the “foundational documents of judicial proceedings” and must be “accurate, reliable, and competently drafted.” Submitting fictitious judgments constitutes not only a procedural abuse but an ethical breach. Even absent bad faith, failure to verify AI-generated legal content breaches a lawyer’s core obligations
- Why it matters now
- Misnumbering is not a credible defense when citations do not exist anywhere—personal costs follow denial.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's counsel cited several Family Court decisions in the complaint that do not exist; the court could not locate them in legal databases and accepted they were AI-generated. Outcome: Petition dismissed in limine; Plaintiff’s counsel ordered to pay ₪1,500 in personal costs to the state and ₪3,500 to the opposing party.
AI Use
The plaintiff’s attorney denied deliberate use of generative AI, claiming the wrong file numbers were inserted by mistake. The court rejected this explanation, finding the hallucinated decisions did not exist in any legal archive and could not plausibly arise from mere misnumbering. The court accepted the defendant’s assertion that the fabricated citations originated from generative AI.
Hallucination Details
Out of five rulings cited in the petition, three were not found in any legal database. Two additional cases were filed after the hearing, but neither matched the original citations or contained the propositions advanced in the pleading. The court found the overall drafting pattern aligned with generative AI hallucination phenomena.
Ruling/Sanction
Judge Merav Eliyahu dismissed the petition and imposed personal costs of ₪1,500 against Plaintiff’s counsel (payable to the state) and ₪3,500 (payable to the opposing party). She cited Supreme Court precedent and ethical commentary emphasizing the risks of hallucinated legal drafting. She emphasized that lawyers must not rely blindly on AI tools and must always verify the authenticity of legal authorities cited in pleadings.
Key Judicial Reasoning
The judge found that legal pleadings are the “foundational documents of judicial proceedings” and must be “accurate, reliable, and competently drafted.” Submitting fictitious judgments constitutes not only a procedural abuse but an ethical breach. Even absent bad faith, failure to verify AI-generated legal content breaches a lawyer’s core obligations.
Operational lesson
Misnumbering is not a credible defense when citations do not exist anywhere—personal costs follow denial.
Record details
CourtIsrael
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateApr 29, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomePetition dismissed in limine; Plaintiff’s counsel ordered to pay ₪1,500 in personal costs to the state and ₪3,500 to the opposing party
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Petition dismissed in limine; Plaintiff’s counsel ordered to pay ₪1,500 in personal costs to the state and ₪3,500 to the opposing party
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's counsel cited several Family Court decisions in the complaint that do not exist; the court could not locate them in legal databases and accepted they were AI-generated.
- Misrepresented: Exhibits & Submissions | Plaintiff's counsel filed different judgments instead of the specific ones cited in the complaint, which were not attached; the court noted the mismatch.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Anonymous v. Anonymous?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's counsel cited several Family Court decisions in the complaint that do not exist; the court could not locate them in legal databases and accepted they were AI-generated. Outcome: Petition dismissed in limine; Plaintiff’s counsel ordered to pay ₪1,500 in personal costs to the state and ₪3,500 to the opposing party.
- Why does Anonymous v. Anonymous matter for legal AI risk?
- Misnumbering is not a credible defense when citations do not exist anywhere—personal costs follow denial.
- What does the public record establish about Anonymous v. Anonymous?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Anonymous v. Anonymous summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.