HomeCasesARIH Québec c. Santé Québec

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

ARIH Québec c. Santé Québec

Québec CS · Apr 22, 2026

CanadaEditorial impact: lowfake citationscontracttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Arbitral reliance on an alleged arbitral decision 'Arbitrage CHU Ste‑Justine (D.T.E. 2018-30)'; SOQUIJ and the Court confirmed this arbitral decision does not exist. Outcome: Arbitral award annulled because the award relied on nonexistent ('hallucinated') authorities..

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Arbitral award annulled because the award relied on nonexistent ('hallucinated') authorities.; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and contract involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Arbitral award annulled because the award relied on nonexistent ('hallucinated') authorities. in Québec CS, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and contract involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Arbitral award annulled because the award relied on nonexistent ('hallucinated') authorities. in Québec CS, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtQuébec CS

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateApr 22, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeArbitrator

OutcomeArbitral award annulled because the award relied on nonexistent ('hallucinated') authorities.

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Arbitral award annulled because the award relied on nonexistent ('hallucinated') authorities.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Arbitral reliance on an alleged arbitral decision 'Arbitrage CHU Ste‑Justine (D.T.E. 2018-30)'; SOQUIJ and the Court confirmed this arbitral decision does not exist.
Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | Arbitral footnote citing a doctrinal piece attributed to Frédéric Bachand; Court found the referenced article/book chapter introuvable and not substantiating the tribunal's point.
Fabricated: Case Law | Arbitral citation to a Court of Appeal decision listed as supporting contractual time‑limits; Court found the cited 'Ville de Montréal c. Syndicat des cols bleus regroupés de Montréal, 2005 QCCA 591' to be nonexistent/the neutral reference refers to another case.
Fabricated: Case Law | Arbitral reference to 'Groleau et Groupe Pages Jaunes Cie, 2011 QCCS 5386' which the Court determined does not exist and the citation number leads to a different decision.
Fabricated: Case Law | Arbitral citation to 'Tremblay c. Commission scolaire de la Jonquière, 2002 CanLII 24357 (QCCA)' found by the Court to be nonexistent/the neutral reference points elsewhere.

Questions this record answers

What happened in ARIH Québec c. Santé Québec?: Fabricated: Case Law | Arbitral reliance on an alleged arbitral decision 'Arbitrage CHU Ste‑Justine (D.T.E. 2018-30)'; SOQUIJ and the Court confirmed this arbitral decision does not exist. Outcome: Arbitral award annulled because the award relied on nonexistent ('hallucinated') authorities..
Why does ARIH Québec c. Santé Québec matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and contract involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Arbitral award annulled because the award relied on nonexistent ('hallucinated') authorities. in Québec CS, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about ARIH Québec c. Santé Québec?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this ARIH Québec c. Santé Québec summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Protection de la jeunesseQuébec CS · Jun 2, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Cames et al. v. Lowe's Home CentersM.D. Florida · Jul 16, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Paige Warthen v. Barclays Bank Delaware (Warthen I, II, III)D. Maryland · Jul 13, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Burlingame v. Argo Private Client Group Ltd, et al.N.D. Ohio · Jul 8, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)BFG Corporation v. Pierce RE Holdings et al.N.D. Illinois · Jun 30, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Zhdanovich-Doty v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance CompanyN.D. California · Jun 22, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Tracked discrepancy record

5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Arbitral reliance on an alleged arbitral decision 'Arbitrage CHU Ste‑Justine (D.T.E. 2018-30)'; SOQUIJ and the Court confirmed this arbitral decision does not exist.

Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | Arbitral footnote citing a doctrinal piece attributed to Frédéric Bachand; Court found the referenced article/book chapter introuvable and not substantiating the tribunal's point.

Fabricated: Case Law | Arbitral citation to a Court of Appeal decision listed as supporting contractual time‑limits; Court found the cited 'Ville de Montréal c. Syndicat des cols bleus regroupés de Montréal, 2005 QCCA 591' to be nonexistent/the neutral reference refers to another case.

Fabricated: Case Law | Arbitral reference to 'Groleau et Groupe Pages Jaunes Cie, 2011 QCCS 5386' which the Court determined does not exist and the citation number leads to a different decision.

Fabricated: Case Law | Arbitral citation to 'Tremblay c. Commission scolaire de la Jonquière, 2002 CanLII 24357 (QCCA)' found by the Court to be nonexistent/the neutral reference points elsewhere.

Questions this record answers

What happened in ARIH Québec c. Santé Québec?

Why does ARIH Québec c. Santé Québec matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about ARIH Québec c. Santé Québec?

Which source supports this ARIH Québec c. Santé Québec summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.