HomeCasesCase No. 14748-08-21

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Case No. 14748-08-21

Supreme Court · Jul 9, 2025

IsraelEditorial impact: lowfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authoritytort

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff’s counsel cited five Israeli Supreme Court decisions that do not exist in legal databases. Outcome: The court dismissed the fabricated evidence and imposed a fine.. Counsel tried to blame the software he used, as well as an intern; court was unimpressed

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is The court dismissed the fabricated evidence and imposed a fine.; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: Blaming the software or an intern is not a defense; the signing attorney owns every citation regardless of tool or delegation.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Blaming the software or an intern is not a defense; the signing attorney owns every citation regardless of tool or delegation.

Record details

CourtSupreme Court

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateJul 9, 2025

AI toolUnidentified

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeThe court dismissed the fabricated evidence and imposed a fine.

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

The court dismissed the fabricated evidence and imposed a fine.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff’s counsel cited five Israeli Supreme Court decisions that do not exist in legal databases.
False Quotes: Case Law | Quotes attributed to the supposed Supreme Court decisions were found to be nonexistent.
Misrepresented: Case Law | The cited case references showed mismatched docket numbers, party names, content, and P.D. citations.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Case No. 14748-08-21?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff’s counsel cited five Israeli Supreme Court decisions that do not exist in legal databases. Outcome: The court dismissed the fabricated evidence and imposed a fine.. Counsel tried to blame the software he used, as well as an intern; court was unimpressed
Why does Case No. 14748-08-21 matter for legal AI risk?: Blaming the software or an intern is not a defense; the signing attorney owns every citation regardless of tool or delegation.
What does the public record establish about Case No. 14748-08-21?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Case No. 14748-08-21 summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

McCormick v. Texakoma FinancialE.D. Texas · Jun 11, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: Unidentified Branden Driver v. CNA Financial Corporation et al.E.D. Wisconsin · Jun 1, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: Unidentified Twigg v. BSN Sports, Inc., et al.M.D. Pennsylvania · May 21, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: Unidentified Keefe v. BMakin Film LtdSC New York · Apr 24, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: Unidentified Mohamed Hussain et al. v. Mansoor Quraishi et al.SC Connecticut · Mar 31, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: Unidentified Couvrette v. WisnovskyD. Oregon · Mar 23, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: Unidentified

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Blaming the software or an intern is not a defense; the signing attorney owns every citation regardless of tool or delegation.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff’s counsel cited five Israeli Supreme Court decisions that do not exist in legal databases.

False Quotes: Case Law | Quotes attributed to the supposed Supreme Court decisions were found to be nonexistent.

Misrepresented: Case Law | The cited case references showed mismatched docket numbers, party names, content, and P.D. citations.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Case No. 14748-08-21?

Why does Case No. 14748-08-21 matter for legal AI risk?

Blaming the software or an intern is not a defense; the signing attorney owns every citation regardless of tool or delegation.

What does the public record establish about Case No. 14748-08-21?

Which source supports this Case No. 14748-08-21 summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.