Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Deutsche Bank National Bank v. Jean LeTennier
SC New York · Jan 8, 2026
NY / stateEditorial impact: highfake citationsmisrepresented authoritycontracttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Submission of no less than 23 fabricated legal authorities across five filings, identified by plaintiff and confirmed by the court. Outcome: Orders affirmed; monetary sanctions imposed (counsel $5,000; defendant $2,500) and costs awarded.
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | Submission of no less than 23 fabricated legal authorities across five filings, identified by plaintiff and confirmed by the court. || Fabricated: Case Law | Example fabricated citation submitted as 'Tishman Realty & Construction Co. v. Regan' with a New York citation that does not correspond to any reported state or federal case. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Misrepresentation of the holding of a real case—presented as dispositive for defendant when the cited case holds the opposite.
- Why it matters now
- Twenty-three fake cites across five filings equals $10K sanctions — mandate cite-check before every filing, not just the first.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Submission of no less than 23 fabricated legal authorities across five filings, identified by plaintiff and confirmed by the court. Outcome: Orders affirmed; monetary sanctions imposed (counsel $5,000; defendant $2,500) and costs awarded.
Operational lesson
Twenty-three fake cites across five filings equals $10K sanctions — mandate cite-check before every filing, not just the first.
Record details
New YorkSingle-state evidence scope
CourtSC New York
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit2nd Circuit
DateJan 8, 2026
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeOrders affirmed; monetary sanctions imposed (counsel $5,000; defendant $2,500) and costs awarded
Known amount$10,000
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Orders affirmed; monetary sanctions imposed (counsel $5,000; defendant $2,500) and costs awarded
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Submission of no less than 23 fabricated legal authorities across five filings, identified by plaintiff and confirmed by the court.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Example fabricated citation submitted as 'Tishman Realty & Construction Co. v. Regan' with a New York citation that does not correspond to any reported state or federal case.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Misrepresentation of the holding of a real case—presented as dispositive for defendant when the cited case holds the opposite.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Deutsche Bank National Bank v. Jean LeTennier?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Submission of no less than 23 fabricated legal authorities across five filings, identified by plaintiff and confirmed by the court. Outcome: Orders affirmed; monetary sanctions imposed (counsel $5,000; defendant $2,500) and costs awarded.
- Why does Deutsche Bank National Bank v. Jean LeTennier matter for legal AI risk?
- Twenty-three fake cites across five filings equals $10K sanctions — mandate cite-check before every filing, not just the first.
- What does the public record establish about Deutsche Bank National Bank v. Jean LeTennier?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this Deutsche Bank National Bank v. Jean LeTennier summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.