HomeCasesDillon v. Myles Stephenson, et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Dillon v. Myles Stephenson, et al.

W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 11, 2026

OK / federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationsmisrepresented authoritycivil rightstrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Misrepresented: Case Law | Court found reporter citation incorrect; a case with the same name exists but the cited reporter and proposition are incorrect/misrepresented. Outcome: Admonishment.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Admonishment; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: Reporter citations must be pulled and confirmed — even one mismatched cite earns a public admonishment on the record.

Why this matter is tracked

Misrepresented: Case Law | Court found reporter citation incorrect; a case with the same name exists but the cited reporter and proposition are incorrect/misrepresented. Outcome: Admonishment.

Operational lesson

Reporter citations must be pulled and confirmed — even one mismatched cite earns a public admonishment on the record.

Record details

OklahomaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtW.D. Oklahoma

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateMar 11, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeAdmonishment

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Admonishment

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Court found reporter citation incorrect; a case with the same name exists but the cited reporter and proposition are incorrect/misrepresented.
Fabricated: Case Law | Court found citation does not exist and is unrelated to the GTCA.
Fabricated: Case Law | Court found citation does not exist and is unrelated to the GTCA.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Dillon v. Myles Stephenson, et al.?: Misrepresented: Case Law | Court found reporter citation incorrect; a case with the same name exists but the cited reporter and proposition are incorrect/misrepresented. Outcome: Admonishment.
Why does Dillon v. Myles Stephenson, et al. matter for legal AI risk?: Reporter citations must be pulled and confirmed — even one mismatched cite earns a public admonishment on the record.
What does the public record establish about Dillon v. Myles Stephenson, et al.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Dillon v. Myles Stephenson, et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Dalton Gage Hill v. Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority (2)W.D. Oklahoma · May 21, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Jane Doe 1, et al. v. Mount Saint Mary High School CorporationW.D. Oklahoma · May 13, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Allahgehovah Jones v. City of Moore, et al.W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 24, 2026same court · fake citations + civil rights Blackburn v. United StatesW.D. Oklahoma · Apr 7, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Dewayne Clark v. CoreCivicW.D. Oklahoma · Mar 6, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Zaykariya v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation, et al.W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 9, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Misrepresented: Case Law | Court found reporter citation incorrect; a case with the same name exists but the cited reporter and proposition are incorrect/misrepresented. Outcome: Admonishment.

Operational lesson

Reporter citations must be pulled and confirmed — even one mismatched cite earns a public admonishment on the record.

Record details

OklahomaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtW.D. Oklahoma

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit10th Circuit

DateMar 11, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeAdmonishment

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Court found reporter citation incorrect; a case with the same name exists but the cited reporter and proposition are incorrect/misrepresented.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court found citation does not exist and is unrelated to the GTCA.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Dillon v. Myles Stephenson, et al.?

Misrepresented: Case Law | Court found reporter citation incorrect; a case with the same name exists but the cited reporter and proposition are incorrect/misrepresented. Outcome: Admonishment.

Why does Dillon v. Myles Stephenson, et al. matter for legal AI risk?

Reporter citations must be pulled and confirmed — even one mismatched cite earns a public admonishment on the record.

What does the public record establish about Dillon v. Myles Stephenson, et al.?

Which source supports this Dillon v. Myles Stephenson, et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.