Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Downing v. Dwayne Brown, et al.
11th Cir. CA · May 20, 2026
/ federalEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationsfabricated quotestort
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant attributed a quotation to a real decision (In re Worldwide Web Sys., Inc., 328 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 2003)) that the court found is not in that opinion—the quotation appears to be fabricated or misattributed. Outcome: Brief partly struck.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Brief partly struck; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Brief partly struck in 11th Cir. CA, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant attributed a quotation to a real decision (In re Worldwide Web Sys., Inc., 328 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 2003)) that the court found is not in that opinion—the quotation appears to be fabricated or misattributed. Outcome: Brief partly struck.
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Brief partly struck in 11th Cir. CA, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
Court11th Cir. CA
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit11th Circuit
DateMay 20, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeBrief partly struck
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Brief partly struck
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant attributed a quotation to a real decision (In re Worldwide Web Sys., Inc., 328 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 2003)) that the court found is not in that opinion—the quotation appears to be fabricated or misattributed.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a non-existent precedent—United States v. Jones, 29 F.4th 1290, 1294 (11th Cir. 2022)—and attributed a quotation to it; the court found the precedent and quoted text do not exist.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Downing v. Dwayne Brown, et al.?
- False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant attributed a quotation to a real decision (In re Worldwide Web Sys., Inc., 328 F.3d 1291 (11th Cir. 2003)) that the court found is not in that opinion—the quotation appears to be fabricated or misattributed. Outcome: Brief partly struck.
- Why does Downing v. Dwayne Brown, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Brief partly struck in 11th Cir. CA, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Downing v. Dwayne Brown, et al.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Downing v. Dwayne Brown, et al. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.