HomeCasesMarion Parnell, Jr. v. Florida Department of Corrections

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Marion Parnell, Jr. v. Florida Department of Corrections

11th Cir. CA · Jul 10, 2026

/ federalEditorial impact: highfake citationsfabricated quotesbar referralemployment

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Case Law | Reply brief included at least five non-existent quotations attributed to Eleventh Circuit opinions. Outcome: Brief partly Struck; Adverse Costs Order; Bar Referral.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Brief partly Struck; Adverse Costs Order; Bar Referral; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Brief partly Struck; Adverse Costs Order; Bar Referral in 11th Cir. CA, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

False Quotes: Case Law | Reply brief included at least five non-existent quotations attributed to Eleventh Circuit opinions. Outcome: Brief partly Struck; Adverse Costs Order; Bar Referral.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Brief partly Struck; Adverse Costs Order; Bar Referral in 11th Cir. CA, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

Court11th Cir. CA

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit11th Circuit

DateJul 10, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeBrief partly Struck; Adverse Costs Order; Bar Referral

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Brief partly Struck; Adverse Costs Order; Bar Referral

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Reply brief included at least five non-existent quotations attributed to Eleventh Circuit opinions.
Fabricated: Case Law | Reply brief cited two non-existent court opinions.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Marion Parnell, Jr. v. Florida Department of Corrections?: False Quotes: Case Law | Reply brief included at least five non-existent quotations attributed to Eleventh Circuit opinions. Outcome: Brief partly Struck; Adverse Costs Order; Bar Referral.
Why does Marion Parnell, Jr. v. Florida Department of Corrections matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Brief partly Struck; Adverse Costs Order; Bar Referral in 11th Cir. CA, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Marion Parnell, Jr. v. Florida Department of Corrections?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Marion Parnell, Jr. v. Florida Department of Corrections summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Akerlund v. Atlas Air, Inc., et al.11th Cir. CA · Jul 10, 2026same court · fake citations + bar referral Downing v. Dwayne Brown, et al.11th Cir. CA · May 20, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Quinteros v. Harbor Distributing, LLCCA California (1d) · Jun 11, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Eliott Williamson v. TransUnion LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc.11th Cir. CA · May 4, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes P-Three Development, LLC v. Therm Flo, Inc.CA Illinois · Jun 30, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Olutosin Ajakaiye v. Omowunmi H. OladipupoCA Maryland · Jun 16, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

False Quotes: Case Law | Reply brief included at least five non-existent quotations attributed to Eleventh Circuit opinions. Outcome: Brief partly Struck; Adverse Costs Order; Bar Referral.

Operational lesson

Questions this record answers

What happened in Marion Parnell, Jr. v. Florida Department of Corrections?

False Quotes: Case Law | Reply brief included at least five non-existent quotations attributed to Eleventh Circuit opinions. Outcome: Brief partly Struck; Adverse Costs Order; Bar Referral.

Why does Marion Parnell, Jr. v. Florida Department of Corrections matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Marion Parnell, Jr. v. Florida Department of Corrections?

Which source supports this Marion Parnell, Jr. v. Florida Department of Corrections summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.