HomeCasesFamily law Case 2024/FA/315

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Family law Case 2024/FA/315

CA Ghent (11th) · Sep 18, 2025

BelgiumEditorial impact: lowfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authorityfamily

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Legal Norm | Conclusion quotes Articles 871 and 877 Ger.W. in incorrect or non‑existent wording; court supplied correct formulations and found the cited language inaccurate. Outcome: Disregarded all fictitious/unfindable sources, admonished counsel.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Disregarded all fictitious/unfindable sources, admonished counsel; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Disregarded all fictitious/unfindable sources, admonished counsel in CA Ghent (11th), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Disregarded all fictitious/unfindable sources, admonished counsel in CA Ghent (11th), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtCA Ghent (11th)

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateSep 18, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeDisregarded all fictitious/unfindable sources, admonished counsel

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Disregarded all fictitious/unfindable sources, admonished counsel

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

8 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Legal Norm | Conclusion quotes Articles 871 and 877 Ger.W. in incorrect or non‑existent wording; court supplied correct formulations and found the cited language inaccurate.
False Quotes: Legal Norm | Conclusion cites an incorrect/oversimplified wording attributed to art. 962 Ger.W. about appointment of experts; court provided correct text and noted the cited version was wrong.
False Quotes: Case Law | Cited ECHR decision 'Moretti en Benedetti t. Italië (27 april 2010, nr. 16318/07)' with passages about paternity recognition was not found in the cited judgment (which concerned adoption) and the quoted language does not appear in the decision.
Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Conclusion cites a non‑existent/incorrect passage attributed to old art. 318 BW regarding recognition where father never maintained a familial bond; court could not find such provision.
Fabricated: Case Law | Regional court judgments (e.g., Hof van Beroep Antwerpen, 20 maart 2019 (2019/AR/0524); Hof van Beroep Brussel, 15 oktober 2018) cited in the conclusion could not be located in Juportal and appear unfindable.
Fabricated: Case Law | Multiple cassation decisions cited (e.g., 'Cass. 6 juni 2019 (C.18.0543.N)', 'Cass. 25 januari 2018 (C.17.0331.N)', 'Cass. 21 oktober 2013') were not found in Juridat/JURA/Juportal and appear unfindable.
Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | A set of Belgian doctrinal works and articles (e.g., S. Stijns RW 2012-13; M. Puelinckx-Coene TPR 2010; F. Swennen TPR 2019, Handboek 2020) were found to be fictional/complete fabrications by the court's database searches.
Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Conclusion contained an incorrect quotation attributed to old art. 1382 BW; court identified the wording as incorrect compared to the real text.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Family law Case 2024/FA/315?: False Quotes: Legal Norm | Conclusion quotes Articles 871 and 877 Ger.W. in incorrect or non‑existent wording; court supplied correct formulations and found the cited language inaccurate. Outcome: Disregarded all fictitious/unfindable sources, admonished counsel.
Why does Family law Case 2024/FA/315 matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Disregarded all fictitious/unfindable sources, admonished counsel in CA Ghent (11th), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Family law Case 2024/FA/315?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Family law Case 2024/FA/315 summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Teresa Jewel Whitten v. Kristopher Brian EverittCA Kentucky · Jul 10, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Ex parte A.I.F.-H. f/k/a A.I.F.CA Alabama · Jun 26, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Olutosin Ajakaiye v. Omowunmi H. OladipupoCA Maryland · Jun 16, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Young v. YoungCA Minnesotta · Jun 8, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)K.C. v. D.R.CA Texas · Apr 30, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Samuel K. v. Winsley FociaCA California · Feb 26, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Tracked discrepancy record

8 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Legal Norm | Conclusion quotes Articles 871 and 877 Ger.W. in incorrect or non‑existent wording; court supplied correct formulations and found the cited language inaccurate.

False Quotes: Legal Norm | Conclusion cites an incorrect/oversimplified wording attributed to art. 962 Ger.W. about appointment of experts; court provided correct text and noted the cited version was wrong.

False Quotes: Case Law | Cited ECHR decision 'Moretti en Benedetti t. Italië (27 april 2010, nr. 16318/07)' with passages about paternity recognition was not found in the cited judgment (which concerned adoption) and the quoted language does not appear in the decision.

Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Conclusion cites a non‑existent/incorrect passage attributed to old art. 318 BW regarding recognition where father never maintained a familial bond; court could not find such provision.

Fabricated: Case Law | Regional court judgments (e.g., Hof van Beroep Antwerpen, 20 maart 2019 (2019/AR/0524); Hof van Beroep Brussel, 15 oktober 2018) cited in the conclusion could not be located in Juportal and appear unfindable.

Fabricated: Case Law | Multiple cassation decisions cited (e.g., 'Cass. 6 juni 2019 (C.18.0543.N)', 'Cass. 25 januari 2018 (C.17.0331.N)', 'Cass. 21 oktober 2013') were not found in Juridat/JURA/Juportal and appear unfindable.

Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | A set of Belgian doctrinal works and articles (e.g., S. Stijns RW 2012-13; M. Puelinckx-Coene TPR 2010; F. Swennen TPR 2019, Handboek 2020) were found to be fictional/complete fabrications by the court's database searches.

Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Conclusion contained an incorrect quotation attributed to old art. 1382 BW; court identified the wording as incorrect compared to the real text.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Family law Case 2024/FA/315?

Why does Family law Case 2024/FA/315 matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Family law Case 2024/FA/315?

Which source supports this Family law Case 2024/FA/315 summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.