In the Interest of S.M.T. and S.J.T., Children
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Jesse Schaefer; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
CA Texas · Jul 30, 2026
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Case Law | Attorney quoted a passage attributed to In re Marriage of Harrison that the court found to be entirely fabricated. Outcome: 3 hours CLE.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority and records 3 hours CLE. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority with 3 hours CLE in CA Texas. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Case Law | Attorney quoted a passage attributed to In re Marriage of Harrison that the court found to be entirely fabricated. Outcome: 3 hours CLE.
This matter connects fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority with 3 hours CLE in CA Texas. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
Corrected 2026-10-30: see the corrections log.
What the record establishes about AI use
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
3 hours CLE
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Attorney quoted a passage attributed to In re Marriage of Harrison that the court found to be entirely fabricated.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Attorney quoted language attributed to In re Marriage of Swim that the court found fabricated.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Attorney attributed a two-part 'dual purposes' statement to Lenz v. Lenz that the court found does not appear in Lenz.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Attorney cited Dickerson v. State for the proposition that he was requesting oral argument though the case does not support that proposition.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Attorney cited In re A.S. as holding conservatorship orders must be specific enough to be enforceable by contempt, but the court found A.S. unrelated to that proposition.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in In the Interest of S.M.T. and S.J.T., Children?
- False Quotes: Case Law | Attorney quoted a passage attributed to In re Marriage of Harrison that the court found to be entirely fabricated. Outcome: 3 hours CLE.
- Why does In the Interest of S.M.T. and S.J.T., Children matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fabricated quotes and misrepresented authority with 3 hours CLE in CA Texas. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about In the Interest of S.M.T. and S.J.T., Children?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this In the Interest of S.M.T. and S.J.T., Children summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.