HomeCasesGabriel v. Mareco

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Gabriel v. Mareco

CA Buenos Aires · Sep 15, 2025

ArgentinaEditorial impact: lowfake citationstortappellate

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Invocación de una causa 'Ortiz' atribuida a esta Sala que no pudo ser localizada en registros internos. Outcome: Recurso de apelación declarado desierto; costas al apelante; se notificará al letrado y al Colegio de Abogados. No se impusieron sanciones profesionales..

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Recurso de apelación declarado desierto; costas al apelante; se notificará al letrado y al Colegio de Abogados. No se impusieron sanciones profesionales.; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: Argentine appellate courts are notifying the bar even without a formal discipline order; the referral itself is the sanction.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Argentine appellate courts are notifying the bar even without a formal discipline order; the referral itself is the sanction.

Record details

CourtCA Buenos Aires

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateSep 15, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeRecurso de apelación declarado desierto; costas al apelante; se notificará al letrado y al Colegio de Abogados. No se impusieron sanciones profesionales.

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Recurso de apelación declarado desierto; costas al apelante; se notificará al letrado y al Colegio de Abogados. No se impusieron sanciones profesionales.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Invocación de una causa 'Ortiz' atribuida a esta Sala que no pudo ser localizada en registros internos.
Fabricated: Case Law | Cita reiterada de un supuesto fallo 'Barrios' señalado como causa n.º 61.169 que no pudo localizarse; base central de los agravios.
Fabricated: Case Law | Referencia a un supuesto fallo 'Rodriguez' atribuido a la Suprema Corte provincial que no aparece en la base de datos oficial (Juba) ni en registros.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Gabriel v. Mareco?: Fabricated: Case Law | Invocación de una causa 'Ortiz' atribuida a esta Sala que no pudo ser localizada en registros internos. Outcome: Recurso de apelación declarado desierto; costas al apelante; se notificará al letrado y al Colegio de Abogados. No se impusieron sanciones profesionales..
Why does Gabriel v. Mareco matter for legal AI risk?: Argentine appellate courts are notifying the bar even without a formal discipline order; the referral itself is the sanction.
What does the public record establish about Gabriel v. Mareco?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Gabriel v. Mareco summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Corrales v BPG InspectionCA Colorado · Jul 2, 2026fake citations + tort · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Matthew Merz v. Harlyn Jenkins, Jillane Baros, Melinda Finn‑KamerathCA Washington · Jun 15, 2026fake citations + tort · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Shaddai Harris v. Nadia Lyotard and Mitchell SadlerCA Texas · Jun 12, 2026fake citations + tort · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Christ Apostolic Temple, Inc., Dwight Reed and Jordan Reed v. Demetrius Sinegal, et al.CA Iowa · May 27, 2026fake citations + tort · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Simmons v. Shahidul IslamCA Tennessee · May 21, 2026fake citations + tort · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Downing v. Dwayne Brown, et al.11th Cir. CA · May 20, 2026fake citations + tort · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Argentine appellate courts are notifying the bar even without a formal discipline order; the referral itself is the sanction.

Record details

CourtCA Buenos Aires

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateSep 15, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeRecurso de apelación declarado desierto; costas al apelante; se notificará al letrado y al Colegio de Abogados. No se impusieron sanciones profesionales.

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Invocación de una causa 'Ortiz' atribuida a esta Sala que no pudo ser localizada en registros internos.

Fabricated: Case Law | Cita reiterada de un supuesto fallo 'Barrios' señalado como causa n.º 61.169 que no pudo localizarse; base central de los agravios.

Fabricated: Case Law | Referencia a un supuesto fallo 'Rodriguez' atribuido a la Suprema Corte provincial que no aparece en la base de datos oficial (Juba) ni en registros.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Gabriel v. Mareco?

Why does Gabriel v. Mareco matter for legal AI risk?

Argentine appellate courts are notifying the bar even without a formal discipline order; the referral itself is the sanction.

What does the public record establish about Gabriel v. Mareco?

Which source supports this Gabriel v. Mareco summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.