Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 80/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Garan Holdings Pty Ltd v Stonepoint Capital Management Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2)
NSW SC · Jun 5, 2026
AustraliaEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationstrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Documents purportedly evidencing the Fund's lending policies were created after litigation and were 'ostensibly created by Artificial Intelligence', i.e. AI‑generated/ex post fabrications relied on as evidence.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is the response recorded in the linked source; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with a recorded judicial response in NSW SC, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Documents purportedly evidencing the Fund's lending policies were created after litigation and were 'ostensibly created by Artificial Intelligence', i.e. AI‑generated/ex post fabrications relied on as evidence.
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with a recorded judicial response in NSW SC, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
CourtNSW SC
Jurisdictioninternational
Circuit4th Circuit
DateJun 5, 2026
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Documents purportedly evidencing the Fund's lending policies were created after litigation and were 'ostensibly created by Artificial Intelligence', i.e. AI‑generated/ex post fabrications relied on as evidence.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Written submissions by Mr Hunt contained hallucinations about legal authorities (fabricated or inaccurate case citations) that went beyond his pleaded case; the court treated those authority citations as unreliable.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Garan Holdings Pty Ltd v Stonepoint Capital Management Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2)?
- Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | Documents purportedly evidencing the Fund's lending policies were created after litigation and were 'ostensibly created by Artificial Intelligence', i.e. AI‑generated/ex post fabrications relied on as evidence.
- Why does Garan Holdings Pty Ltd v Stonepoint Capital Management Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2) matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with a recorded judicial response in NSW SC, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Garan Holdings Pty Ltd v Stonepoint Capital Management Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2)?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Garan Holdings Pty Ltd v Stonepoint Capital Management Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2) summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.