HomeCasesGivati et al. v. Peri

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Givati et al. v. Peri

Magistrate's Court Jaffa · Aug 31, 2025

IsraelEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationscriminaltrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | In a legal response, the complainant cited several legal precedents ("מובאות משפטיות") that could not be located in any official database Outcome: Corrections to filings ordered.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Corrections to filings ordered; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: Courts in Israel now order pro-se filers to correct AI-fabricated citations; expect the same screening of our filings.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Courts in Israel now order pro-se filers to correct AI-fabricated citations; expect the same screening of our filings.

Record details

CourtMagistrate's Court Jaffa

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateAug 31, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeCorrections to filings ordered

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Corrections to filings ordered

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | In a legal response, the complainant cited several legal precedents ("מובאות משפטיות") that could not be located in any official database

Questions this record answers

What happened in Givati et al. v. Peri?: Fabricated: Case Law | In a legal response, the complainant cited several legal precedents ("מובאות משפטיות") that could not be located in any official database Outcome: Corrections to filings ordered.
Why does Givati et al. v. Peri matter for legal AI risk?: Courts in Israel now order pro-se filers to correct AI-fabricated citations; expect the same screening of our filings.
What does the public record establish about Givati et al. v. Peri?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Givati et al. v. Peri summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

USA v. OrganesN.D. Illinois · Jun 29, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)United States v. Michael Shane DeBaere (2)W.D. Virginia · Jan 23, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Rivard v. Dept. of CorrectionsVermont SC · Dec 10, 2025pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Ali Taj Bey v. Mark GlassM.D. Florida · Dec 1, 2025pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)R v WallaceKB New Brunswick · Nov 20, 2025pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)United States v. MalikD. Maryland · Sep 19, 2025pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Courts in Israel now order pro-se filers to correct AI-fabricated citations; expect the same screening of our filings.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Givati et al. v. Peri?

Why does Givati et al. v. Peri matter for legal AI risk?

Courts in Israel now order pro-se filers to correct AI-fabricated citations; expect the same screening of our filings.

What does the public record establish about Givati et al. v. Peri?

Which source supports this Givati et al. v. Peri summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.