Which source supports this Ali Taj Bey v. Mark Glass summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

HomeCasesAli Taj Bey v. Mark Glass

Evidence review: primary document verified. The linked primary document was extracted and checked with page-level evidence locators.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passes the current publication gate; that is not a legal-editorial review or a guarantee that every field has been independently verified.

Corpus matter record

Ali Taj Bey v. Mark Glass

M.D. Florida · Dec 1, 2025

FL / federal Editorial impact: low pro se fake citations criminal trial Warning

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

The court issued a warning to the pro se plaintiff after identifying a fabricated case citation ('Ford v. Browning') in the complaint, which the judge attributed to the likely use of artificial intelligence during the drafting process.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's complaint cites 'Ford v. Browning, 568 F.3d 1175 (11th Cir. 2009)'; the Court could not find this Eleventh Circuit case and described the citation as a likely AI-generated hallucination.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Florida, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Why this matter is tracked

In a pro se civil rights action, the plaintiff cited 'Ford v. Browning, 568 F.3d 1175 (11th Cir. 2009)' to support a claim under the Ex parte Young doctrine. The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida was unable to locate the cited case and identified it as a likely AI-generated hallucination. While the court ultimately dismissed the complaint without prejudice based on Younger abstention principles regarding an ongoing state criminal proceeding, it issued a formal warning to the plaintiff regarding the use of AI in drafting filings and the potential for future sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 for submitting fabricated legal authorities.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Florida, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Record details

FloridaSingle-state evidence scope

Explore FLOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.

CourtM.D. Florida

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit11th Circuit

DateDec 1, 2025

AI toolAI (unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeThe court dismissed the complaint without prejudice and issued a warning regarding the use of AI-generated fabricated citations.

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

implied

The court explicitly mentions the likely use of artificial intelligence.

Procedural posture

The court granted the defendants' motions to dismiss the amended complaint without prejudice based on Younger abstention.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's complaint cites 'Ford v. Browning, 568 F.3d 1175 (11th Cir. 2009)'; the Court could not find this Eleventh Circuit case and described the citation as a likely AI-generated hallucination.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Ali Taj Bey v. Mark Glass?: The court issued a warning to the pro se plaintiff after identifying a fabricated case citation ('Ford v. Browning') in the complaint, which the judge attributed to the likely use of artificial intelligence during the drafting process.
Why does Ali Taj Bey v. Mark Glass matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in M.D. Florida, with the listed outcome: Warning.
What does the public record establish about Ali Taj Bey v. Mark Glass?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Ali Taj Bey v. Mark Glass summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Rose v. Arts Bonita, Inc.M.D. Florida · Aug 12, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Edwards v. De Cubas & Lewis, P.A.M.D. Florida · Jul 1, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Stringer v. White Cap Supply Holdings, LLCM.D. Florida · May 14, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Johnson v. Florida Department of Juvenile Justice et alM.D. Florida · Feb 19, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Farag v. Persante et alM.D. Florida · Jan 26, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Peter J. Allsot v. Naseem LatifM.D. Florida · Jan 20, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Evidence-review statusprimary document verified

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Evidence review recorded Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Sep 10, 2026; latest tracked decision Sep 8, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open M.D. Florida profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology