HomeCasesGloriose Ndaryiyumvire v Birmingham City University

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 95/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Gloriose Ndaryiyumvire v Birmingham City University

County Court (Birmingham) · Oct 14, 2025

GBEditorial impact: highfake citationsbar referralcontracttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Application cited 'Qureshi v Qureshi [1998] 1 WLR 174' as authority for amendments; court found no such authority exists and the citation was fictitious (the cited neutral citation corresponds to an unrelated case). Outcome: Wasted costs order; Bar Referral.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Wasted costs order; Bar Referral; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: LEAP and other paid legal AI will fabricate authority — wasted-costs plus bar referral follow automatically.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

LEAP and other paid legal AI will fabricate authority — wasted-costs plus bar referral follow automatically.

Record details

CourtCounty Court (Birmingham)

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateOct 14, 2025

AI toolLEAP legal software

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeWasted costs order; Bar Referral

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

LEAP legal software is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Wasted costs order; Bar Referral

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Application cited 'Qureshi v Qureshi [1998] 1 WLR 174' as authority for amendments; court found no such authority exists and the citation was fictitious (the cited neutral citation corresponds to an unrelated case).
Fabricated: Case Law | Application cited 'Z Ltd v A Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 110' as authority for allowing amendments; court found the case name to be fictitious (the neutral citation corresponds to TS (Burma) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) and the citation was fabricated.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Gloriose Ndaryiyumvire v Birmingham City University?: Fabricated: Case Law | Application cited 'Qureshi v Qureshi [1998] 1 WLR 174' as authority for amendments; court found no such authority exists and the citation was fictitious (the cited neutral citation corresponds to an unrelated case). Outcome: Wasted costs order; Bar Referral.
Why does Gloriose Ndaryiyumvire v Birmingham City University matter for legal AI risk?: LEAP and other paid legal AI will fabricate authority — wasted-costs plus bar referral follow automatically.
What does the public record establish about Gloriose Ndaryiyumvire v Birmingham City University?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Gloriose Ndaryiyumvire v Birmingham City University summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Withers v. City of AberdeenN.D. Mississippi · Jun 8, 2026fake citations + bar referral Laurie Ibach and Mark Stewart v. Bruce StewartSC Alabama · Apr 24, 2026fake citations + bar referral Krista C. Geddes v. LoanCare, LLC, et al.E.D. California · Apr 22, 2026fake citations + bar referral Heimkes v. Fairhope Motorcoach Resort Condominium Owners Association, Inc.S.D. Alabama · Mar 31, 2026fake citations + bar referral Ezequiel Cunha de Moura e outro v. Wallace de Moura SilvaTJ-RJ · Mar 30, 2026fake citations + bar referral AC739-2026CSJ · Feb 13, 2026fake citations + bar referral

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

LEAP and other paid legal AI will fabricate authority — wasted-costs plus bar referral follow automatically.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Application cited 'Z Ltd v A Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 110' as authority for allowing amendments; court found the case name to be fictitious (the neutral citation corresponds to TS (Burma) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) and the citation was fabricated.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Gloriose Ndaryiyumvire v Birmingham City University?

Why does Gloriose Ndaryiyumvire v Birmingham City University matter for legal AI risk?

LEAP and other paid legal AI will fabricate authority — wasted-costs plus bar referral follow automatically.

What does the public record establish about Gloriose Ndaryiyumvire v Birmingham City University?

Which source supports this Gloriose Ndaryiyumvire v Birmingham City University summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.