Public trackerCorpus refreshed Sep 10, 2026 · Latest decision Sep 8, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesGraciela Dela Torre v. Davies Life & Health, Inc., et al.
Evidence review: primary document verified. The linked primary document was extracted and checked with page-level evidence locators.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 80/100. It passes the current publication gate; that is not a legal-editorial review or a guarantee that every field has been independently verified.
Corpus matter record

Graciela Dela Torre v. Davies Life & Health, Inc., et al.

N.D. Illinois · Apr 11, 2025

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

The court denied the plaintiff's motions for default judgment, finding that the plaintiff failed to effectuate service and relied on frivolous, misrepresented, and fabricated legal citations. The court granted the defendant's request to waive service and set a deadline for a response to the complaint.

Why the court cared
The court reasoned that the plaintiff's citations were frivolous because they either misidentified the court of origin, involved irrelevant subject matter, or did not exist in the cited jurisdiction, thereby failing to support the plaintiff's argument regarding service of process.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with a recorded judicial response in N.D. Illinois, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

In a pro se contract action, the N.D. Illinois court denied the plaintiff's motions for default judgment against the defendant. The court found that the plaintiff failed to effectuate proper service of process and repeatedly relied on frivolous legal citations. Specifically, the court identified that the plaintiff misrepresented several cases, including Kirkland v. American Title Ins. Co. and In re Marriage of Schmitt, which were either inapposite or contained no discussion of the relevant service issues. Additionally, the court noted that the plaintiff cited a fabricated case, United States v. Balan, which does not exist in the Northern District of Illinois. The court characterized these filings as a waste of judicial resources and granted the defendant's request to waive service.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with a recorded judicial response in N.D. Illinois, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

IllinoisSingle-state evidence scope
Explore ILOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtN.D. Illinois
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit7th Circuit
DateApr 11, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomePlaintiff's motions for default judgment were denied; defendant's request to waive service was granted.
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

The court record does not name a tool, but the nature of the errors implies AI usage.

Procedural posture

Minute entry denying plaintiff's motions for default judgment and granting defendant's request to waive service.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

9 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Kirkland v. American Title Ins. Co., "692 F. Supp. 153, 155 (N.D. Ill. 1988)"; court found the case was decided in the E.D.N.Y. and the opinion contains no discussion of certified mail, so the citation does not support the proposition.
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited United States v. Balan, 2013 WL 5539296 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 7, 2013); court found the Westlaw number yields Trahan v. Verret (La. App. Ct. 2013) and no matching N.D. Ill. decision exists — citation incorrect/likely fabricated.
  3. Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Plaintiff relied on 735 ILCS 5/2-203.1 to argue certified mail is effective service; court explained the statute only permits moving for alternative service authorization and does not itself authorize service by certified mail.
  4. Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited People ex rel. Devine v. $30,700.00 U.S. Currency, 199 Ill. 2d 142 (2002); court noted Devine is an Illinois forfeiture case governed by different statutes about notice of forfeiture and is inapposite to service of process.
  5. Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited In re Marriage of Schmitt, 391 Ill. App. 3d 1010 (2d Dist. 2009); court found Schmitt concerns dissolution of marriage and contains no discussion of service by certified mail, making the citation irrelevant.
  6. Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Plaintiff cited 735 ILCS 5/2-203.1 as authorizing service by certified mail; the court explained the statute only allows seeking authorization for alternative service and does not authorize certified-mail service without a court order.
  7. Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Kirkland v. American Title Ins. Co., '692 F. Supp. 153, 155 (N.D. Ill. 1988)' to support certified-mail service; the court found the opinion was from the Eastern District of New York and contains no discussion of certified mail, so the citation was misapplied/misrepresented.
  8. Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'United States v. Balan, 2013 WL 5539296 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 7, 2013)'; the court found the Westlaw number corresponds to a Louisiana appellate case (Trahan v. Verret) and no Northern District of Illinois decision by that title exists, indicating a fabricated or incorrect citation.
Show 1 additional discrepancies
  1. Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited In re Marriage of Schmitt, 391 Ill. App. 3d 1010 (2d Dist. 2009) for the proposition that certified mail effected service; the court observed Schmitt concerns marital dissolution and contains no discussion of service by certified mail, so the case was inapposite/misrepresented.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Graciela Dela Torre v. Davies Life & Health, Inc., et al.?
The court denied the plaintiff's motions for default judgment, finding that the plaintiff failed to effectuate service and relied on frivolous, misrepresented, and fabricated legal citations. The court granted the defendant's request to waive service and set a deadline for a response to the complaint.
Why does Graciela Dela Torre v. Davies Life & Health, Inc., et al. matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with a recorded judicial response in N.D. Illinois, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Graciela Dela Torre v. Davies Life & Health, Inc., et al.?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Graciela Dela Torre v. Davies Life & Health, Inc., et al. summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.