Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Gully v Varghese
SC New York · May 12, 2026
NY / stateEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationstorttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited this non-existent Appellate Division decision in support of her summary judgment; court found the citation fabricated and struck the submission. Outcome: Brief struck.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Brief struck; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Brief struck in SC New York, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited this non-existent Appellate Division decision in support of her summary judgment; court found the citation fabricated and struck the submission. Outcome: Brief struck.
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Brief struck in SC New York, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
New YorkSingle-state evidence scope
CourtSC New York
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit2nd Circuit
DateMay 12, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeBrief struck
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Brief struck
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited this non-existent Appellate Division decision in support of her summary judgment; court found the citation fabricated and struck the submission.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited this non-existent Appellate Division decision in support of her summary judgment; court found the citation fabricated and struck the submission.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited this non-existent Appellate Division decision in support of her summary judgment; court found the citation fabricated and struck the submission.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Gully v Varghese?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited this non-existent Appellate Division decision in support of her summary judgment; court found the citation fabricated and struck the submission. Outcome: Brief struck.
- Why does Gully v Varghese matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Brief struck in SC New York, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Gully v Varghese?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Gully v Varghese summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.