HomeCasesHilpert v. 16 Judge SPV LLC

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Hilpert v. 16 Judge SPV LLC

SC New York · Dec 4, 2025

NY / stateEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quotescontract

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed seven quotations to cases that do not contain those quotations; the court found these to be fabricated or misattributed quotations relied on in his motion papers. Outcome: Costs Order.

Why the court cared: False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed seven quotations to cases that do not contain those quotations; the court found these to be fabricated or misattributed quotations relied on in his motion papers. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited “Loeb v Loeb, 84 AD2d 591 (2d Dept 1981)” and attributed a quotation to it; the court found 84 AD2d 591 corresponds to unrelated 3rd Dept decisions (Sanginario; First Depot) and the cited Loeb decision/quotation does not exist as represented. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on a dozen purported authorities that the court and opposing counsel identified as nonexistent case citations listed in defense filings (NYSCEF Doc No. 102).
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in SC New York, with the listed outcome: Costs Order.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in SC New York, with the listed outcome: Costs Order.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtSC New York

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit2nd Circuit

DateDec 4, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeCosts Order

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Costs Order

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed seven quotations to cases that do not contain those quotations; the court found these to be fabricated or misattributed quotations relied on in his motion papers.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited “Loeb v Loeb, 84 AD2d 591 (2d Dept 1981)” and attributed a quotation to it; the court found 84 AD2d 591 corresponds to unrelated 3rd Dept decisions (Sanginario; First Depot) and the cited Loeb decision/quotation does not exist as represented.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on a dozen purported authorities that the court and opposing counsel identified as nonexistent case citations listed in defense filings (NYSCEF Doc No. 102).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Hilpert v. 16 Judge SPV LLC?: False Quotes: Case Law | Plaintiff attributed seven quotations to cases that do not contain those quotations; the court found these to be fabricated or misattributed quotations relied on in his motion papers. Outcome: Costs Order.
Why does Hilpert v. 16 Judge SPV LLC matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in SC New York, with the listed outcome: Costs Order.
What does the public record establish about Hilpert v. 16 Judge SPV LLC?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Hilpert v. 16 Judge SPV LLC summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Sharei Torah v. HendelSC New York · Jun 1, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Ellen Michaelis v. Wilmington Savings Fund SocietySC New York · Apr 3, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Morris Gafni v. Rapid Foreclosure Refunds et al.SC New York · Nov 21, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations NewRez LLC v. MortonSC New York · Oct 2, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Fora Financial Asset Securitization v. Teona Ostrov Public RelationsSC New York · Jan 24, 2025same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Keefe v. BMakin Film LtdSC New York · Apr 24, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in SC New York, with the listed outcome: Costs Order.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtSC New York

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit2nd Circuit

DateDec 4, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeCosts Order

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited “Loeb v Loeb, 84 AD2d 591 (2d Dept 1981)” and attributed a quotation to it; the court found 84 AD2d 591 corresponds to unrelated 3rd Dept decisions (Sanginario; First Depot) and the cited Loeb decision/quotation does not exist as represented.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on a dozen purported authorities that the court and opposing counsel identified as nonexistent case citations listed in defense filings (NYSCEF Doc No. 102).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Hilpert v. 16 Judge SPV LLC?

Why does Hilpert v. 16 Judge SPV LLC matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in SC New York, with the listed outcome: Costs Order.

What does the public record establish about Hilpert v. 16 Judge SPV LLC?

Which source supports this Hilpert v. 16 Judge SPV LLC summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.