HomeCasesIn re: María V. Irizarry Centeno; Anissa M. Bonilla Irizarry

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

In re: María V. Irizarry Centeno; Anissa M. Bonilla Irizarry

TS Puerto Rico · Apr 21, 2026

PR / stateEditorial impact: mediumfake citationsfabricated quotescontracttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Promovidas attributed an ad verbatim quote to 'Suárez v. CMI Caribe, 180 DPR 367, 376 (2010)' that the Court found did not exist or was incorrectly attributed. Outcome: Admonishment.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Admonishment; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Admonishment in TS Puerto Rico, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Admonishment in TS Puerto Rico, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtTS Puerto Rico

Jurisdictionstate

CircuitNot recorded

DateApr 21, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeAdmonishment

Known amount$1,000

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Admonishment

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Promovidas attributed an ad verbatim quote to 'Suárez v. CMI Caribe, 180 DPR 367, 376 (2010)' that the Court found did not exist or was incorrectly attributed.
Fabricated: Case Law | Promovidas cited 'Otero-Burgos v. Inter Med. Supplies, Inc., 137 DPR 841, 848 (1995)' and attributed a direct quote which the record shows was nonexistent or misattributed.
Fabricated: Case Law | Promovidas cited 'Pérez v. Horizon Lines, 2020 TSPR 61' with an asserted quotation about Ley 100 that the Court determined was incorrectly attributed or nonexistent.
Fabricated: Case Law | Promovidas attributed to 'Rosado v. ELA, 2004 TSPR 13' a textual statement on Ley 115 that the Court found was not supported by the cited decision.
Fabricated: Case Law | Promovidas cited 'Colón v. Romero Barceló, 112 DPR 573 (1982)' and ascribed a direct quotation regarding Artículo 1802 which the Court found did not appear as quoted in that decision.
Fabricated: Case Law | Promovidas cited 'Ramos Lozada v. E.L.A., 174 DPR 650 (2008)' attributing a quote on qualified immunity that the Court determined was incorrectly attributed or nonexistent.

Questions this record answers

What happened in In re: María V. Irizarry Centeno; Anissa M. Bonilla Irizarry?: Fabricated: Case Law | Promovidas attributed an ad verbatim quote to 'Suárez v. CMI Caribe, 180 DPR 367, 376 (2010)' that the Court found did not exist or was incorrectly attributed. Outcome: Admonishment.
Why does In re: María V. Irizarry Centeno; Anissa M. Bonilla Irizarry matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Admonishment in TS Puerto Rico, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about In re: María V. Irizarry Centeno; Anissa M. Bonilla Irizarry?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this In re: María V. Irizarry Centeno; Anissa M. Bonilla Irizarry summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Puerto Rico Soccer League NFP, Corp., et al. v. Federación Puertorriqueña de Futbol, et al.D. Puerto Rico · Sep 23, 2025same jurisdiction · fake citations + fabricated quotes Mintvest Capital, LTD v. NYDIG Trust Company, et al.D. Puerto Rico · Jun 23, 2025same jurisdiction · fake citations + fabricated quotes Fernando Betancourt Gómez v. Colegio de ProfesionalesPuerto Rico · Aug 22, 2025same jurisdiction · fake citations + fabricated quotes Leafwell, Inc. v. The Doc App, Inc. (2)M.D. Florida · Jun 9, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Sharei Torah v. HendelSC New York · Jun 1, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Yehuda et al. v. G.G.A.B. Real Estate Initiative and Investments Ltd.Ashdod Small Claims Court · May 28, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Tracked discrepancy record

6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Promovidas attributed an ad verbatim quote to 'Suárez v. CMI Caribe, 180 DPR 367, 376 (2010)' that the Court found did not exist or was incorrectly attributed.

Fabricated: Case Law | Promovidas cited 'Otero-Burgos v. Inter Med. Supplies, Inc., 137 DPR 841, 848 (1995)' and attributed a direct quote which the record shows was nonexistent or misattributed.

Fabricated: Case Law | Promovidas cited 'Pérez v. Horizon Lines, 2020 TSPR 61' with an asserted quotation about Ley 100 that the Court determined was incorrectly attributed or nonexistent.

Fabricated: Case Law | Promovidas attributed to 'Rosado v. ELA, 2004 TSPR 13' a textual statement on Ley 115 that the Court found was not supported by the cited decision.

Fabricated: Case Law | Promovidas cited 'Colón v. Romero Barceló, 112 DPR 573 (1982)' and ascribed a direct quotation regarding Artículo 1802 which the Court found did not appear as quoted in that decision.

Fabricated: Case Law | Promovidas cited 'Ramos Lozada v. E.L.A., 174 DPR 650 (2008)' attributing a quote on qualified immunity that the Court determined was incorrectly attributed or nonexistent.

Questions this record answers

What happened in In re: María V. Irizarry Centeno; Anissa M. Bonilla Irizarry?

Why does In re: María V. Irizarry Centeno; Anissa M. Bonilla Irizarry matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about In re: María V. Irizarry Centeno; Anissa M. Bonilla Irizarry?

Which source supports this In re: María V. Irizarry Centeno; Anissa M. Bonilla Irizarry summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.