Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 24, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Home/recorded consequences/Non-monetary order
Source-linked corpus view

Non-monetary order

Non-monetary order appears in 57 of 2,205 public corpus records (2.6%). This page describes the recorded dataset, not an incidence rate, prevalence of AI use, or a prediction of future outcomes.

Matched records57
Corpus denominator2,205
Source linked100%
Latest trackedSep 15, 2026
Evidence-based answer

What issues appear in matters recording Non-monetary order?

Taxonomy definition: A court ordered a measure that costs no money and is not discipline: continuing legal education or other training, community service, or an apology. Certification and disclosure duties for future filings are not counted here, and a voluntary apology is not an order.

AI Vortex currently links 57 source-linked public matters that record Non-monetary order. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (52), Fabricated or altered quotations (29) and Misrepresented authority (27). Recorded responses and outcomes include Non-monetary order (CLE, community service, apology) (57), Monetary sanction (38) and Professional discipline (26). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the consequence.

Every count below links to the exact matching records. The linked source, subsequent docket history, and local procedural context remain controlling.

Leading issue signalFabricated authorities52 records
Leading recorded responseNon-monetary order (CLE, community service, apology)57 records
Known USD amounts$128,11734 known · 4 unquantified
Recorded date rangeNov 25, 2024through Sep 15, 2026
Observed issue mix

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within a single matter.

Recorded consequences

How did courts or authorities respond?

Response categories can overlap and do not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

Participant context

Who appears in these matters?

Matter context

Which practice areas are represented?

Attribution status

How is AI involvement recorded?

Unspecified attribution is not evidence that a particular vendor was used.

Corpus evolution

When were these matters recorded?

Public records in this view

Showing the most recent 24 of 57 matching records.

Bell v. City of Clairton et al.W.D. Pennsylvania · PA · Lexis AI
Sep 15, 2026
Tiekert v. Village of Mamaroneck, et al.S.D. New York · NY · ChatGPT
Sep 14, 2026
Beus Gilbert PLLC v. Brigham Young University et al.D. Utah · UT · Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini
Sep 9, 2026
Registered Trustees of the Assemblies of God Gospel Church International (AGGCI) v Registrar of Societies and OthersHigh Court · Tanzania · AI (implied, unspecified)
Sep 3, 2026
Erin Booker v. The Kroger Co.N.D. Georgia · GA · Unidentified
Aug 28, 2026
LPC Commercial Services, LLC v. Ar-Razzaaq Properties, LLCCA Virginia · VA · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 25, 2026
TOV Realty, LLC v. Suarez; Kosel Equity, LLC v. MacGregorSC Connecticut · CT · ChatGPT
Jul 31, 2026
In the Interest of S.M.T. and S.J.T., ChildrenCA Texas · TX · AI (implied, unspecified)
Jul 30, 2026
In re Rosslyn2016, LLC, et al.S.D. Texas (Bankruptcy) · TX · Westlaw Precision
Jul 14, 2026
James F. v. Commissioner of Social SecurityE.D. Michigan · MI · Unidentified
Jul 13, 2026
McCormick v. Texakoma FinancialE.D. Texas · TX · Unidentified
Jun 11, 2026
Herbert Brooks v. Lowes Home Centers LLCW.D. Louisiana · LA · AI (implied, unspecified)
May 18, 2026
Gregoire v. Board of Trustees of SF BARTN.D. California · CA · AI (implied, unspecified)
May 6, 2026
Hannah Renee Payne v. The StateSC Georgia · GA · Unidentified
May 5, 2026
Jessica Fuller v. Hyde School, et al.D. Maine · ME · Claude or ChatGPT
May 5, 2026
Rasheem Carter, et al. v. UZGlobal LLC, et al.D. New Mexico · NM · Unidentified
May 1, 2026
Anthony C. Hill v. Workday, Inc. (2)N.D. California · CA · CoCounsel
Apr 28, 2026
Loyer v. Wayne County Michigan et al.E.D. Michigan · MI · Unidentified
Apr 28, 2026
Bunce v. Visual Technology Innovations (2)E.D. Pennsylvania · PA · Unidentified
Apr 20, 2026
In re Troylond Malon WiseW.D. Louisiana (Bankruptcy) · LA · Unidentified
Apr 9, 2026
Chelsea Montes v. Suns Legacy Partners LLCD. Arizona · AZ · AI (implied, unspecified)
Mar 31, 2026
Nicholas and Barbara Moulder v. Davis School District (on behalf of M.M.)D. Utah · UT · Unidentified
Mar 23, 2026
State v. ColemanCA Ohio · OH · ChatGPT
Mar 20, 2026
Woodward Harbor L.L.C., et al. v. City of MandevilleE.D. Louisiana · LA · AI (implied, unspecified)
Mar 5, 2026
Open the full analytics view

Scope and limitation

This page groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish a judge’s general practices or sanction rate. For every entity type, the view is not a comparison against unobserved proceedings.

Indexing and evidence status

This public entity profile is indexable and meets the evidence-depth baseline of at least 3 source-linked records.