Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Christian Lavell Jennings v. Vandergriff Honda
CA Texas · May 28, 2026
TX / stateEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authority
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
In Christian Lavell Jennings v. Vandergriff Honda, the CA Texas addressed a Fabricated: Case Law in a pro se litigant filing. The linked source records that appellant cited a nonexistent case 'In re Katherine S., 118 S.W.3d 743, 746 (Tex. 2003)'; the court determined the case does not exist. The source record does not state a separate procedural consequence. The entry is dated 2026-05-28. It supports a focused account of the authority problem and does not establish an unrecorded AI tool, motive, or wider factual finding.
- Why the court cared
- The linked source identifies the filing problem as: Appellant cited a nonexistent case 'In re Katherine S., 118 S.W.3d 743, 746 (Tex. 2003)'; the court determined the case does not exist..
- Why it matters now
- The source records a concrete authority-verification problem in a state proceeding and the tribunal’s documented response to it.
Why this matter is tracked
In Christian Lavell Jennings v. Vandergriff Honda, the CA Texas addressed a Fabricated: Case Law in a pro se litigant filing. The linked source records that appellant cited a nonexistent case 'In re Katherine S., 118 S.W.3d 743, 746 (Tex. 2003)'; the court determined the case does not exist. The source record does not state a separate procedural consequence. The entry is dated 2026-05-28. It supports a focused account of the authority problem and does not establish an unrecorded AI tool, motive, or wider factual finding.
Operational lesson
The source records a concrete authority-verification problem in a state proceeding and the tribunal’s documented response to it.
Record details
TexasSingle-state evidence scope
CourtCA Texas
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit5th Circuit
DateMay 28, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a nonexistent case 'In re Katherine S., 118 S.W.3d 743, 746 (Tex. 2003)'; the court determined the case does not exist.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Appellant attributed a quotation to Lane Bank that does not appear in that opinion; the court noted the quoted language is not found in Lane Bank and the case stands for a narrower proposition.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited PNS Stores v. Rivera for a broad due-process proposition; the court explained the cited opinion concerned summary-judgment/jurisdictional issues and does not support the appellant's proposition.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited In re D.W. for the proposition that courts commit reversible error when ignoring objections to procedural misconduct; the court observed the cited opinion addressed family-code and termination issues and does not support that broad proposition.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Christian Lavell Jennings v. Vandergriff Honda?
- In Christian Lavell Jennings v. Vandergriff Honda, the CA Texas addressed a Fabricated: Case Law in a pro se litigant filing. The linked source records that appellant cited a nonexistent case 'In re Katherine S., 118 S.W.3d 743, 746 (Tex. 2003)'; the court determined the case does not exist. The source record does not state a separate procedural consequence. The entry is dated 2026-05-28. It supports a focused account of the authority problem and does not establish an unrecorded AI tool, motive, or wider factual finding.
- Why does Christian Lavell Jennings v. Vandergriff Honda matter for legal AI risk?
- The source records a concrete authority-verification problem in a state proceeding and the tribunal’s documented response to it.
- What does the public record establish about Christian Lavell Jennings v. Vandergriff Honda?
- Limited to the linked source and the documented citation or quotation issue and stated disposition; no unrecorded tool, motive, or broader litigation facts are inferred.
- Which source supports this Christian Lavell Jennings v. Vandergriff Honda summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.